Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc., 92 N.W.2d 96.

63 citing documents.

Kevin Kopka, et al., individually and as parents and natural guardians of minor children B. Kopka and I. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hosp., Inc., Fields v. Mankato Elec.
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
See, e.g. , Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hosp., Inc. , 253 Minn. 418 , , 99 (1958) ; Benesh v. Garvais , 221 Minn. 1 , , 533 (1945), overruled on other grounds , 253 Minn. 418 , , 103 (1958) ; Goss v. Goss , 102 Minn. 346 , 113 N.W.
Stephen Ballard v. City of Duluth, Professional Golf Management, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Stephen Ballard v. City of Duluth, Professional Golf Management, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The intent of the parties and the question of actual compensation are questions of fact for the [factfinder].” 4 Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hosp., Inc., 253 Minn. 418, 428
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 781 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2010
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 781 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2010
at 128 , d at 165 ; see also Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hosp., Inc., 253 Minn. 418, 426-27
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 761 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 761 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
For example, in Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hosp., Inc., the Minnesota Supreme Court expressly disapproved of the indiscriminate application of the general rule, stating that such a rule “offend[s] the basic principle of law that an injured party should be wholly compensated for his injuries where liability exists.” 253 Minn. 418, 424 , see also Wall v. Fairview Hosp.
Molloy v. Meier 679 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2004
Pemberton v. Theis 668 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Pemberton v. Theis 668 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In fact, the release states that Pemberton expressly reserved the right “to pursue any liability and underinsured benefits [she] may have.” See, e.g., Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hosp., 253 Minn. 418, 427 , (noting that “considerations of practical justice” require that plaintiff not be compelled to give up a claim for relief unless he has intentionally done so, or has received full compensation for the claim).
Bondy v. Allen 635 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bondy v. Allen 635 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hosp., Inc., 253 Minn. 418, 427 , (finding doctor was subsequent tortfeasor, rather than joint tortfeasor, where doctor misdiagnosed a fractured vertebra after a fall on public bus); see also U.S. Lines, Inc. v. United States, 470 F.2d 487, 491 (5th Cir.1972) (stating tortfeasor and physician subsequently aggravating in
Ruddy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 596 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Ruddy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 596 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Clark, d at 465 -66 (quoting Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hosp., Inc., 253 Minn. 418, 427 , ).
Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services 584 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1998
Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services 584 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1998
Fabio v. Bellomo 504 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1993
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUT. 463 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1990
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUT. 463 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1990
See also Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc., 253 Minn. 418, 424 , , 100 *757 (1958); Gronquist v. Olson, 242 Minn. 119, 126
Mutual Service Life Insurance Co. v. Galaxy Builders, Inc. 435 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Mutual Service Life Insurance Co. v. Galaxy Builders, Inc. 435 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
E.g., Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc., 253 Minn. 418
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 430 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 430 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
1(6) (1986); Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hosp., 253 Minn. 418
Wittmer v. Ruegemer 419 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1988
Wittmer v. Ruegemer 419 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1988
E.g., Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc., 253 Minn. 418 , d *498 96 (1958).
Clark v. Allstate Insurance Co. 405 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Clark v. Allstate Insurance Co. 405 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, 253 Minn. 418, 427
Hedlund v. Hedlund 371 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hedlund v. Hedlund 371 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc., 253 Minn. 418
Lundgren v. Eustermann 356 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lundgren v. Eustermann 356 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc., 253 Minn. 418, 421
Sorensen v. Coast-To-Coast Stores (Central Organization), Inc. 353 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Sorensen v. Coast-To-Coast Stores (Central Organization), Inc. 353 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc., 253 Minn. 418
Vasek v. Warren Grain & Seed Co. 353 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Vasek v. Warren Grain & Seed Co. 353 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc., 253 Minn. 418
Luxenburg v. Can-Tex Industries 257 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1977
Luxenburg v. Can-Tex Industries 257 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1977
We discussed them in Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc., 253 Minn. 418, 424 , : “It may be conceded that the holdings in Benesh v. Garvais, supra, [ 221 Minn. 1 , ] and Smith v. Mann, supra, provide a certain facility in ending disputes in this area.
Burner Service & Combustion Controls Co. v. City of Minneapolis 250 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1977
Burner Service & Combustion Controls Co. v. City of Minneapolis 250 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1977
Rule 56.08, Rules of Civil Procedure; Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc. 253 Minn. 418 , 10 Dunnell, Dig.
Wild v. Rarig 234 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1975
Wild v. Rarig 234 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1975
(3 ed.) § 5608; Schmucking v. Mayo, 183 Minn. 37 , Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc. 253 Minn. 418 , for the general rule that for most causes of action fraudulent concealment of the existence of a cause of action will toll the statute of limitations, postponing the commencement of the running of the statute until discovery or reasonable opportunity for discovery of the fact by the exercise o
Rathbun v. WT Grant Company 219 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1974
Rathbun v. WT Grant Company 219 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1974
Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc. 253 Minn. 418
Cimino v. Alway 501 P.2d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc. 190 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1971
Swang v. Hauser 180 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1970
Swang v. Hauser 180 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1970
183 Minn. 354 , , 74 A. L. R. 1312; Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc. 253 Minn. 418 , 92 N. W. (2d) 96 .
Hall v. Community Credit Company 178 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1970