Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Holt v. Swenson, 90 N.W.2d 724.

46 citing documents.

Terry Colton, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A “meeting of the minds[ ]does not require a subjective mutual intent to agree on the same thing in the same sense.”
Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The phrase “meeting of the minds” does not “require a subjective mutual intent to agree on the s ame thing in the same sense.”
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
Conduct 1.5(a), (c); see also Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 514-15, (holding that a contingent-fee agreement is permissible so long as it is not overreaching or unreasonable).
Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A. v. Gene Rechtzigel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A. v. Gene Rechtzigel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
the contract may be either express or implied.” Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 514, 4 According to the invoices dating from as early as 2010, the rate fees for Kaardal’s services increased to an hourly rate of $300.
Donald D. David v. Bartel Enterprises (Nitro Green), Relator, and SFM Mutual Insurance Company, Relator. 856 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 2014
Donald D. David v. Bartel Enterprises (Nitro Green), Relator, and SFM Mutual Insurance Company, Relator. 856 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 2014
We have previously said that contingent fees are condemned “only where an attorney has taken advantage of a client’s circumstances to exact an unreasonable or unconscionable proportion of the client’s claim.” Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 514 , -28 (1958).
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
[A]greements made after services have been rendered should be closely scrutinized to see that there has been no overreaching and that the client was fully informed.” (citation omitted)); Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 515, (“Courts are reluctant to invoke the principle that indefiniteness prevents the creation of a contract where a just result, consistent with a reasonably expressed intent of the parties, can be reached by upholding the agreement.”).
Hanson v. State Farm Insurance Co. 661 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hanson v. State Farm Insurance Co. 661 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 514-15
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
See Holt v. Sivenson, 252 Minn. 510, 517 , (stating that the “character, ability, and experience” of the attorney, “the difficulty of the propositions involved,” and the “results obtained” are among factors in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees).
Warrick v. Graffiti, Inc. 550 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Warrick v. Graffiti, Inc. 550 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Park Glen also cites Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 516 , holding that silence may sometimes be regarded as acceptance of an offer.
Gorham v. Benson Optical 539 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gorham v. Benson Optical 539 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 516 , -29 (1958).
Western Insulation Services, Inc. v. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha 460 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Western Insulation Services, Inc. v. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha 460 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 516 , (citation omitted).
Schumann v. Northtown Insurance Agency, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Schumann v. Northtown Insurance Agency, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 516
Schwandt Sanitation of Paynesville v. City of Paynesville 423 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Schwandt Sanitation of Paynesville v. City of Paynesville 423 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 516
Gryc v. Lewis 410 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gryc v. Lewis 410 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 516
Skalbeck v. Agristor Leasing 384 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Skalbeck v. Agristor Leasing 384 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 516 , ).
Rosenberg v. Townsend, Rosenberg & Young, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Rosenberg v. Townsend, Rosenberg & Young, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 516
Continental Casualty Co. v. Knowlton 232 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1975
Continental Casualty Co. v. Knowlton 232 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1975
In the case of Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510, 514 , we said: “In passing on the sufficiency of the evidence, it is to be borne in mind that a party has an unrestricted right to contract with his attorney as to compensation for services and the measure and mode thereof, and that the contract may be either express or implied.
Burns v. Valene 214 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1974
Burns v. Valene 214 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1974
Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510 , Hollister v. Ulvi, 199 Minn. 269
Kittler & Hedelson v. Sheehan Properties, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1973
Kittler & Hedelson v. Sheehan Properties, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1973
Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510
Krueger v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 202 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1972
Krueger v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 202 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1972
The record in this case is not as substantial as that in Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510 , significantly involving a fee dispute between client and counsel, but it is at least minimally sufficient.
Bloomer v. Bloomer 185 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1971
Bloomer v. Bloomer 185 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1971
Miller v. Snedeker, 257 Minn. 204 , 101 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad, 267 Minn. 283 , 126 N. W. (2d) 380 ; Breen v. Cameron, 132 Minn. 357 , ; Donovan v. Dixon, 261 Minn. 455 , 113 N. W. (2d) 432 ; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510 , 90 N. W. (2d) 724 ; Nielsen v. City of St.
Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
See, Donovan v. Dixon, 261 Minn. 455 , 113 N. W. (2d) 432 ; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510 , 90 N. W. (2d) 724 ; Nielsen v. City of St.
Donaldson v. Kohner 118 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1962
Donaldson v. Kohner 118 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1962
1 Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510 , 90 N. W. (2d) 724 ; Heise v. J. R. Clark Co. 245 Minn. 179 , 71 N. W. (2d) 818 .
Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510 , 90 N. W. (2d) 724 ; Nielsen v. City of St.