Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Grier v. Estate of Grier, 89 N.W.2d 398.

28 citing documents.

In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
We have held that it would be unreasonable to interpret the guardianship statute to mean that guardians must “obtain express approval for every act relating to the personal care and custody of the ward’s person.” Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 147
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Adeline v. Dorosh. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Adeline v. Dorosh. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 149, 10 (applying the then-current version of the guardianship-venue statute and concluding that “there is no requirement that the guardianship venue be transferred whenever there is a subsequent change of the ward’s domicile”).
In re the Guardianship of Tschumy 834 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Guardianship of Tschumy 834 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Moreover, the supreme court has observed that “[g]uardianship statutes are designed to provide flexibility and adaptability in caring for the ward according to his changing needs.” Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 148
In re Guardianship of DeYoung 801 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re Guardianship of DeYoung 801 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
as placing [the guardian] in a legal straitjacket which deprives [the guardian] of all discretion and flexibility in meeting the needs of the ward.” Grier v. Grier’s Estate, 252 Minn. 143, 148 , -03 (1958).
Rockford Township v. City of Rockford 608 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Rockford Township v. City of Rockford 608 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
§ 645.16 (purpose of statute and consequences of particular interpretation can be considered to determine legislative intent); Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 148 , (same).
O'SELL v. Peterson 595 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
O'SELL v. Peterson 595 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-07 (Minn.1982) (analyzing “residency in a household” in no-fault context); Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 147 , (holding “residence” means legal residence for will probate).
In Re the Welfare of Hofmaster 434 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of Hofmaster 434 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
§ 645.16 (1986); see also Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 148
Freidrichs v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 410 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Freidrichs v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 410 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Phipps, d at 594 (citing Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 145 , ).
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 396 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 396 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 145
Town Board of Marshan v. City Council of Hastings 298 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1980
Town Board of Marshan v. City Council of Hastings 298 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1980
Cf. Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 149
In Re Estate of Bush 224 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1974
Lee v. Arrowood 224 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1974
Lee v. Arrowood 224 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1974
In the case of Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 145 , we rejected the contention that the district court’s granting of judgment on the pleadings denied appellants the right to a trial de novo, stating: “* * * Whether it be in an action initially commenced in the district court or in a proceeding brought to that court as a de novo matte
In Re Estate of Bush 224 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1974
In the case of Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 145 , we rejected the contention that the district court's granting of judgment on the pleadings denied appellants the right to a trial de novo, stating: "* * * Whether it be in an action initially commenced in the district court or in a proceeding brought to that court as a de novo matter
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
It may be noted that Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, supra, has been referred to in Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288 , 69 N. W. (2d) 667 , and Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143 , 89 N. W. (2d) 398 .
Stephenson v. Plastics Corporation of America 150 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1967
Stephenson v. Plastics Corporation of America 150 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1967
1 See, Rule 12.03, Rules of Civil Procedure; Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391 , 122 N. W. (2d) 26 ; Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143 , 89 N. W. (2d) 398 ; Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern Nat.