Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 91 N.W.2d 642.

43 citing documents.

Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam Minn. 2020
a claim that a statute violated the general prohibition on special legislation) , – 51 (Minn. 1958) (same), –63 (Minn. 1964) (addressing a claim t hat a statute was a special law granting special or exclusive privileges to a corporation, association, or individual) , –65 (Minn. 1958) (same), Wichelman v. Messner , 83 W.2d 800, 823 –25 (Minn. 1957) (sam e), and State ex rel.
City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation 231 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Willette v. the Mayo Foundation 458 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Willette v. the Mayo Foundation 458 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Carlson v. Smogard, 298 Minn. 362, 366 , Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173
Snyder v. City of Minneapolis 441 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1989
Snyder v. City of Minneapolis 441 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1989
Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173
Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp. 432 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1988
Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp. 432 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1988
Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173
Castor v. City of Minneapolis 429 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1988
Matter of Schroeder 415 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of Schroeder 415 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
E.g., City of Pipestone v. Madsen, 287 Minn. 357, 363 , Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173 , State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 221 Minn. 255 , 21 N.W.
State v. Skinner 403 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Skinner 403 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Housing and Redevelopment Authority v. Greenman, 255 Minn. 396, 403 , (quoting Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173 , ).
Hickman v. Group Health Plan, Inc. 396 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1986
Hickman v. Group Health Plan, Inc. 396 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1986
Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164
Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement Board 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
Christensen v. Mpls. Mun. Emp. Retire. Bd. 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement Board 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
For example, in Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 184 , we said, “[A]ll contracts made by the state are entered into subject to the implied condition that they are ever subordinate to a reasonable and proper exercise of the state’s inalienable police power.” This exercise of the police power is, however, itself constrained by the federal a
Christensen v. Mpls. Mun. Emp. Retire. Bd. 331 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1983
For example, in Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 184 , we said, "[A]ll contracts made by the state are entered into subject to the implied condition that they are ever subordinate to a reasonable and proper exercise of the state's inalienable police power."
State on Behalf of Forslund v. Bronson 305 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1981
State on Behalf of Forslund v. Bronson 305 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1981
E. g., City of Pipestone v. Madsen, 287 Minn. 357, 363 , Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173 , State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 221 Minn. 255 , .
Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries 283 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1979
Tracy v. Streater/Litton Industries 283 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1979
See, Schwartz v. Taimo, 295 Minn. 356, 363 , Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn, 164, 173 and cases cited in note 9
City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters 276 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1979
City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters 276 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1979
E. g., City of Pipestone v. Madsen, 287 Minn. 357, 363 , Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173 , State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co., 221 Minn. 255 , .
Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority v. Hawk 232 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1975
Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority v. Hawk 232 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1975
City of Pipestone v. Madsen, 287 Minn. 357 , Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164
Bodin v. City of St. Paul 227 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1975
Bodin v. City of St. Paul 227 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1975
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local No. 59 v. Spannaus, 404 U. S. 886 , 92 S. Ct. 196 , 30 L. ed. 2d 168 (1971); Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Obermeyer, supra; Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164 , State v. International Harvester Co. 241 Minn. 367 , , appeal dismissed, 348 U. S. 853 , 75 S. Ct. 78 , 99 L. ed. 672 (1954).
Walters v. County of Olmsted 204 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1973
Walters v. County of Olmsted 204 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1973
ions that the ordinance is arbitrary and capricious or unconstitutional as being in deprivation of plaintiffs’ rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, see Town of Oronoco v. City of Rochester, 293 Minn. 468 , Williams v. Rolfe, 262 Minn. 284 , Grobe v. Oak Center Creamery Co. 262 Minn. 60 , Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164 , Connor v. Township of Chanhassen, 249 Minn. 205
Hoene v. Jamieson 182 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1970
Hoene v. Jamieson 182 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1970
“* * * The power of the court to declare a law unconstitutional is to be exercised only when absolutely necessary in the particular case and then with great caution.” Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173 , 91 N. W. (2d) 642, 650 .
City of Pipestone v. Madsen 178 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1970
City of Pipestone v. Madsen 178 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1970
We stated in Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173 , 91 N. W. (2d) 642 , 650: «* * * [A]n act [of the legislature] * * * will not be declared unconstitutional unless its invalidity appears clearly or unless it is shown beyond a reasonable doubt that it violates some constitutional provision.
State v. Edwards 177 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1970
State v. Edwards 177 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1970
State v. LeFebvre, 174 Minn. 248 , ; State v. Palmer, 212 Minn. 388 , 3 N. W. (2d) 666 ; Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164 , 91 N. W. (2d) 642 .
Grobe v. Oak Center Creamery Co. 113 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1962
Grobe v. Oak Center Creamery Co. 113 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1962
Hamm Brewing Co. 197 Minn. 608 , ; Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173 , 91 N. W. (2d) 642, 650 ; 17 Dunnell, Dig.
Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County *144 of Steele, 181 Minn. 427 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190; Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164 , 91 N. W. (2d) 642 ; Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Comm.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. Greenman 96 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1959
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. Greenman 96 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1959
In Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164, 173 , 91 N. W. (2d) 642, 650 , we said: “* * * since an act [of the legislature] is presumed to be constitutional, it will not be declared unconstitutional, unless its invalidity appears clearly or unless it is shown beyond a reasonable doubt that it violates some constitutional provision.