DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 94 N.W.2d 273.

51 citing documents.

  • Julianne E. Micken, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    for the proposition that a seller’s failure to cancel a contract for deed does not allow a buyer to perform contractual obligations years later.
  • In re the Estate of: Terry Lee McCoy, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    governed by fixed principles.” d 273, 284 (Minn. 1959).
  • Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • Dakota County HRA v. Blackwell 602 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1999
  • Dakota County HRA v. Blackwell 602 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1999
    See Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123, 134
  • Ortiz v. Gavenda 574 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Ortiz v. Gavenda 574 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    Determination of the real party in interest is a- question of fact, Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123, 136 , -84 (1959), and will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.
  • Lilyerd v. Carlson 499 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1993
  • Lilyerd v. Carlson 499 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1993
    9 Specific performance is an equitable remedy, however, “addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court,” Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123, 134 , and is generally not afforded where it will work a hardship or injustice on either party.
  • Thompson v. Kromhout 413 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Thompson v. Kromhout 413 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123, 136 , see also Simon Home Builders, (absent fraud, mutual mistake *886 or allegation that vendor had unclean hands, specific performance appropriate).
  • White v. Boucher 322 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1982
  • White v. Boucher 322 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1982
    It is the broker’s duty to communicate to the seller “all facts of which he has knowledge which might affect the principal’s rights or interests.” Magee v. Odden, 220 Minn. 498, 503 , Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , Lowrie v. Christenson, 165 Minn. 181 , 206 N.W.
  • Hilton v. Nelsen 283 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1979
  • Hilton v. Nelsen 283 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1979
    “[S]pecific performance of a contract to convey real estate is not a matter of absolute right, and if enforcement would be unconscionable or inequitable, performance will not be decreed.” Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123, 136
  • Flynn v. Sawyer 272 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1978
  • Flynn v. Sawyer 272 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1978
    Co., Minn., Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123, 134
  • Jensen v. Peterson 264 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1978
  • Jensen v. Peterson 264 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1978
    Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123
  • Guider v. MAYCO INC. 252 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1977
  • Guider v. MAYCO INC. 252 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1977
    See, Miller v. Snedeker, 257 Minn. 204 , Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123
  • In Re Application of Berman v. Kieren 247 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1976
  • In Re Application of Berman v. Kieren 247 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1976
    Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 128 , and cases cited therein.
  • Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co. 232 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1975
  • Vieths v. Thorp Finance Co. 232 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1975
    See, also, Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123
  • Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, Iowa 231 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1975
  • Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, Iowa 231 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1975
    Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn: 123, Restatement, Agency 2d, §§ 112, 165.
  • Furuseth v. Olson 210 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1973
  • Furuseth v. Olson 210 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1973
    Restatement, Contracts, § 373; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 17B Dunnell, Dig.
  • Village of Burnsville v. WESTWOOD COMPANY 189 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 1971
  • Village of Burnsville v. WESTWOOD COMPANY 189 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 1971
    Doyen v. Bauer, supra; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 .
  • Bloomer v. Bloomer 185 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1971
  • Bloomer v. Bloomer 185 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1971
    Miller v. Snedeker, 257 Minn. 204 , 101 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad, 267 Minn. 283 , 126 N. W. (2d) 380 ; Breen v. Cameron, 132 Minn. 357 , ; Donovan v. Dixon, 261 Minn. 455 , 113 N. W. (2d) 432 ; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510 , 90 N. W. (2d) 724 ; Nielsen v. City of St.
  • Brownlee v. Ertzos 182 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1970
  • Brownlee v. Ertzos 182 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1970
    Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164, 169 , 143 N. W. (2d) 215, 220 .
  • Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co. 153 N.W.2d 832 Minn. 1967
  • Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co. 153 N.W.2d 832 Minn. 1967
    11 In Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 , this court held that the plaintiff, who took no action under a purchase agreement for 18 months, could not enforce it against the vendor.
  • Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
  • Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
    See, Donovan v. Dixon, 261 Minn. 455 , 113 N. W. (2d) 432 ; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Holt v. Swenson, 252 Minn. 510 , 90 N. W. (2d) 724 ; Nielsen v. City of St.
  • Costello v. Johnson 121 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1963
  • Costello v. Johnson 121 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1963
    Co. 244 Minn. 192 , 69 N. W. *212 (2d) 660; Lipinski v. Lipinski, 227 Minn. 511 , 35 N. W. (2d) 708 ; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Miller v. Snedeker, 257 Minn. 204 , 101 N. W. (2d) 213 .
  • State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 115 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1962
  • State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 115 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1962
    In Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123, 137 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273, 284 , we said: “* * * The findings of the trial court * * * are entitled to the same weight as the verdict of a jury and will not be reversed on appeal unless they are manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, * * An appellate court is controlled by this elementary rule, even though i
  • Donovan v. Dixon 113 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1962
  • Donovan v. Dixon 113 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1962
    See, State v. McCoy, 228 Minn. 420 , 38 N. W. (2d) 386 ; Holz v. Pearson, 229 Minn. 395 , 39 N. W. (2d) 867 ; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123, 137 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 , *461 284; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Melco Investment Co. v. Gapp 105 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1960
  • Melco Investment Co. v. Gapp 105 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1960
    The situation here is not comparable to that in Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 , relied upon by the defendant.
  • Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. Zacho 104 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1960
  • Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. Zacho 104 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1960
    2 Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52.01; Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell, 254 Minn. 123 , 94 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; Greer v. Stannard, 85 Mont.
  • Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960