Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tombs v. Ashworth, 95 N.W.2d 423.

42 citing documents.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Respondent, vs. True Gravity Ventures, LLC, et al., Respondents, Astra Genstar ... Minn. 2025
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Respondent, vs. True Gravity Ventures, LLC, et al., Respondents, Astra Genstar ... Minn. 2025
Wells Fargo asserted that the appeal should be dismissed because it was late under Minnesota Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 104
In re Welfare of the Child of R.K. 901 N.W.2d 156 Minn. 2017
In re Welfare of the Child of R.K. 901 N.W.2d 156 Minn. 2017
te rules are intended to eliminate); Commandeur LLC v. Howard Hartry, Inc., -12 (Minn. 2006) (construing “legal holiday” to include Columbus Day even though, the judicial branch does not recognize that holiday, based in part on a ‘“preference that actions be determined on the merits’ ” ()); Tombs v, Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , (noting that in general “‘limitations upon the time for taking an appeal are to be liberally construed to avoid a forfeiture of the right of appeal’ ” (quoting Weckerling v.
A.C. Ford v. State 690 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2005
A.C. Ford v. State 690 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2005
See Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55, 62 , (holding that failure of the clerk to comply with Rule 77.04 requiring service of notice of entry of judgment does not extend the time for appeal)
Marriage of Mingen v. Mingen 679 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 2004
Marriage of Mingen v. Mingen 679 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 2004
See Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55, 62 , ("the law is clear that the time for appealing from a judgment commences to run upon the entry thereof and that failure of the clerk to comply with Rule 77.04 with respect to service of notice does not affect the time for appealing”).
Limongelli v. GAN National Insurance Co. 590 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Limongelli v. GAN National Insurance Co. 590 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55, 61
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Certified Services, Inc. 432 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Certified Services, Inc. 432 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of Minneapolis, 281 Minn. 576, 578 , Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55, 62-63 , -29 (1959) (the notice requirements of Rule 77.04 do not relieve the parties of the responsibility of determining the date of entry of judgment).
City of Albert Lea v. Harrer 381 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
City of Albert Lea v. Harrer 381 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , (clerk is bound by Minn.R.Civ.P.
Southland Corp. v. City of Minneapolis 279 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1979
Southland Corp. v. City of Minneapolis 279 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1979
See, Brown’s Bay Marine Corp. v. Skrypec, 271 Minn. 523 , Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55
Elwell v. County of Hennepin 221 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1974
Elwell v. County of Hennepin 221 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1974
Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , Eisenberg v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
LYON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. Ricke's, Inc. 207 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1973
LYON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. Ricke's, Inc. 207 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1973
See, Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55, 58
LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of Minneapolis 162 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1968
LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of Minneapolis 162 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1968
Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423 .
Cox v. Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 161 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1968
Cox v. Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 161 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1968
Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423 ; Eisenberg v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
LaFond v. Sczepanski 141 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 1966
LaFond v. Sczepanski 141 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 1966
Co. v. Village of Nashwauk, 176 Minn. 117 , ; Breslaw v. Breslaw, 229 Minn. 371 , 39 N. W. (2d) 499 ; Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co. 231 Minn. 167 , 42 N. W. (2d) 701 ; State v. Alm, 261 Minn. 238 , 111 N. W. (2d) 517 ; Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423 .
BROWN'S BAY MARINE CORPORATION v. Skrypec 136 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1965
BROWN'S BAY MARINE CORPORATION v. Skrypec 136 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1965
2 The most recent decision of this court pertaining to the authority of the district court to vacate a judgment in a civil action in order to permit appeal is Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423 , where the earlier Minnesota decisions and the relevant statutes and sections of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure are reviewed.
County of Hennepin v. County of Becker 135 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1965
County of Hennepin v. County of Becker 135 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1965
In Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423 , we said that time for perfecting an appeal cannot be extended by order of the court, agreement of parties, or rules of civil procedure.
Eisenberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 134 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1965
Eisenberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 134 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1965
We held in Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423 , that an appellant is not entitled to have a valid authorized judgment vacated for the sole purpose of reentering the same judgment and then appealing therefrom.
Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 132 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1965
Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 132 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1965
See, Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55, 60 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423, 426 .
Kearns v. Julette Originals Dress Co. 126 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1964
Kearns v. Julette Originals Dress Co. 126 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1964
9 Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423 ; Independent School Dist.
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 857 v. Seem 116 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1962
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 857 v. Seem 116 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1962
1 Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423 ; Kelsey v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. 262 Minn. 219 , 114 N. W. (2d) 90 .
Tryggeseth v. Norcross 115 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1962
Tryggeseth v. Norcross 115 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1962
Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55, 57 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423, 425 .
State v. Alm 111 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1961
State v. Alm 111 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1961
In Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55, 60 , 95 N. W. (2d) 423, 426 , we held that the trial court may not, after the time to appeal from a judgment has expired, vacate the judgment and reenter it for the purpose of permitting an appeal to be taken.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by