Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Juvland v. Plaisance, 96 N.W.2d 537.

25 citing documents.

A19-1654 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Cloverdale Foods of Minn. , d at 49 -50 ().
Buskey v. Am. Legion Post 910 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2018
Buskey v. Am. Legion Post 910 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2018
Juvland v. Plaisance , 255 Minn. 262 , , 542 (1959).
Sitek v. Striker 764 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Sitek v. Striker 764 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See Cloverdale Foods of Minn., -50 (Minn.App.1998) (citing Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262, 269-70 , ).
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Newmech Companies 678 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Newmech Companies 678 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
see also Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262, 268-69 , -42 (1959).
Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. Snacks 580 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. Snacks 580 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262, 269-70 , (fact question raised *50 concerning whether party materially or substantially breached a contract).
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 505 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1993
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 505 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1993
Buysse, d at 874 citing Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262, 268-69, -42 (1959).
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 448 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1989
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 448 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1989
Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262, 268-69 , -42 (1959).
Steen v. Those Underwriters at Lloyds, London Signatory to Policy No. E0100191 442 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Steen v. Those Underwriters at Lloyds, London Signatory to Policy No. E0100191 442 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262, 268-69 , -42 (1959).
Miller v. Shugart 316 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1982
Miller v. Shugart 316 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1982
Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262
Rieschl v. Travelers Insurance Co. 313 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1981
Rieschl v. Travelers Insurance Co. 313 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1981
See, e.g., Noehl v. Midwest Empire, Inc., 298 Minn. 565 , Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262
City of Shakopee v. Kopp & Associates, Inc. 159 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1968
City of Shakopee v. Kopp & Associates, Inc. 159 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1968
Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262 , 96 N. W. (2d) 537 .
Rakness v. Swift and Company 147 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1966
Rakness v. Swift and Company 147 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1966
Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co. 257 Minn. 487 , 102 N. W. (2d) 293 ; Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262 , 96 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593 .
White v. Boulton 107 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1961
White v. Boulton 107 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1961
Plaintiff contends that, although defendant violated the provision of Ms policy by failing to cooperate, the insurer must show affirmatively that it was prejudiced by such conduct; The most recent case in tMs state involving the breach of the cooperation clause in an automobile liability insurance policy is Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262, 266 , 96 N. W. (2d) 537, 540 .