Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 96 N.W.2d 585.

29 citing documents.

Graco, Inc., Minn. 2020
v. Rippen, 19 MFLSA, and thus we hold that the City’s regulation of minimum-wage rates, through the ordinance, is not preempted.
State of Minnesota v. James Nils Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. James Nils Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334
Breza v. City of Minnetrista 725 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
Breza v. City of Minnetrista 725 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
See Minnetonka Electric Co. v. Village of Golden Valley, 273 Minn. 301, 304 , (ruling that where state legislature has preempted the field, municipal ordinance that conflicted with state law could not operate); Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334, 336 , (ruling that village did not have implied power to license boats).
Hyland v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 538 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hyland v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 538 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334, 336 , ).
State v. Gonzales 483 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Gonzales 483 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Cf. Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334, 338 , (noting the absurdity of local boat licensing, requiring a boat owner to obtain a license in each municipality).
Welsh v. City of Orono 355 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1984
Welsh v. City of Orono 355 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1984
Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334 , Minnetonka Electric Co. v. Village of Golden Valley, 273 Minn. 301
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P. 216 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1974
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P. 216 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1974
As such, it has no inherent powers, but rather it only has “such powers as are expressly conferred by statute or are implied as necessary in aid of those powers which are expressly conferred.” Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334, 336
Peterson v. Board of County Commissioners 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
In Re Independent School Dist. No. 381 in Lake Cty. 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
In Re Independent School Dist. No. 381 in Lake Cty. 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
*638 Appellant also relies on Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334
Peterson v. Board of County Commissioners 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
Appellant also relies on Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334
Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of Richfield 143 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1966
Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of Richfield 143 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1966
Co. v. Village of Golden Valley, 273 Minn. 301 , 141 N. W. (2d) 138 ; Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334 , 96 N. W. (2d) 585 .
Minnetonka Electric Co. v. Village of Golden Valley 141 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1966
Minnetonka Electric Co. v. Village of Golden Valley 141 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1966
While plaintiff relied upon Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334 , 96 N. W. (2d) 585 , which held that a village ordinance requiring licenses for boats used on certain lakes was invalid, as controlling and decisive of the issues herein in its favor, the court below thought otherwise, suggesting that the subject of boat licensing was not peculiarly subject to local regulation and th
Kronschnabel v. City of Saint Paul 137 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1965
Kronschnabel v. City of Saint Paul 137 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1965
Anoka Co. Committee v. M. A. C. 248 Minn. 134 , 78 N. W. (2d) 722 ; John Wright & Associates, Inc. v. City of Red Wing, 254 Minn. 1 , 93 N. W. (2d) 660 ; Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334 , 96 N. W. (2d) 585 ; 13A Dunnell, Dig.
Borgelt v. City of Minneapolis 135 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1965
Borgelt v. City of Minneapolis 135 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1965
Village of Fridley v. City of Columbia Heights, 237 Minn. 124 , 53 N. W. (2d) 831 ; Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334 , 96 N. W. (2d) 585 ; 13A Dunnell, Dig.
Construction & General Laborers Union, Local 563 v. City of St. Paul 134 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1965
Construction & General Laborers Union, Local 563 v. City of St. Paul 134 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1965
In Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334 , 96 N. W. (2d) 585 , this court held that Brooklyn Center had no power to license boats or pass an ordinance therefor — that this was a statewide matter; that where the activity or the subject of local regulation is not “peculiarly local in character,” the regulatory power under the general welfare clause is not to b
State v. Hoben 98 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1959
State v. Hoben 98 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1959
32, we said in the redent case of Village of Brooklyn Center v. Rippen, 255 Minn. 334, 337 , 96 N. W. (2d) 585 , 588: “In this jurisdiction we are committed to a liberal interpretation of statutory and charter provisions as to the exercise of the police power by municipalities concerning matters peculiarly subject to local regulation.