Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 97 N.W.2d 656.

44 citing documents.

Transit Team, Inc. v. Metropolitan Council 679 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Transit Team, Inc. v. Metropolitan Council 679 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Paul, 256 Minn. 146, 155 , -65 (1959).
Lienhard v. State 431 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1988
Lienhard v. State 431 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1988
Paul, 256 Minn. 146, 152
Central Lakes Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 743 411 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Central Lakes Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 743 411 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The primary purpose of this requirement is “to aid the appellate court by affording it a clear understanding of the ground * * * of the decision.” Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146, 155 , -65 (1959).
Northwest Petroleum Ass'n v. Minnesota Department of Economic Security 402 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Northwest Petroleum Ass'n v. Minnesota Department of Economic Security 402 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 *596 Minn. 146 , the court noted that factors other than financial return niay be relevant in determining whether competitive bidding procedures must be followed.
Nelson v. Nelson 384 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nelson v. Nelson 384 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The purpose of the rule is to “aid [an] appellate court by affording it a clear understanding of the ground or basis of the decision * * *.” Asch v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146, 155 , -65 (1959).
Reed v. Christman 376 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Reed v. Christman 376 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Paul, 256 Minn. 146, 155 , -5 (1959).
City of Shakopee v. Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative 303 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
City of Shakopee v. Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative 303 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
HRA IN AND FOR CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Froney 234 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1975
HRA IN AND FOR CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Froney 234 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1975
Paul v. Greenman, 255 Minn. 396 , Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , Housing & Redevel.
HOUSING & REDEV. AUTH. OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Schapiro 210 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1973
HOUSING & REDEV. AUTH. OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Schapiro 210 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1973
E.g., Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177 , Asch v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Greenman, 255 Minn. 396 , Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Minneapolis Metropolitan Co. 259 Minn. 1 , Port Authority of City of St.
Roberson v. Roberson 206 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1973
Roberson v. Roberson 206 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1973
Kendall v. Kendall, 289 Minn. 494 , Posselt v. Posselt, 271 Minn. 575 , Asch v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Groppoli 202 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1972
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Groppoli 202 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1972
E.g., Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177 , Asch v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Greenman, 255 Minn. 396 , Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Minneapolis Metropolitan Co. 259 Minn. 1 , Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Coleman’s Service, Inc. 281 Minn. 63 , d
Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Coleman's Service, Inc. 160 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1968
Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Coleman's Service, Inc. 160 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1968
And in Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N. W. (2d) 656 , we held that the determination of an authority to resell land, after it had been redeveloped, to a private business concern was the exercise of a legislative function delegated to the authority and that from the record we could not conclude that such determination was manifestly arbitrary or unre
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
See, Housing and Redevelopment Authority v. Greenman, 255 Minn. 396 , 96 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N. W. (2d) 656 ; Housing and Redevelopment Authority v. Minneapolis Metropolitan Co. 259 Minn. 1 , 104 N. W. (2d) 864 ; Berman v. Parker, 348 U. S. 26 , 75 S. Ct. 98 , 99 L. ed. 27.
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF SAINT PAUL v. Fisher 145 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1966
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF SAINT PAUL v. Fisher 145 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1966
In Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N. W. (2d) 656 , upholding the reclamation of blighted lands and a sale thereof to private persons for commercial development, we expressly recognized that reclamation of such lands confers a general community benefit.
Posselt v. Posselt 136 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1965
Posselt v. Posselt 136 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1965
4 Allen v. Village of Savage, 261 Minn. 334 , 112 N. W. (2d) 807 ; Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N. W. (2d) 656 .
Midway Mobile Home Mart, Inc. v. City of Fridley 135 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1965
Midway Mobile Home Mart, Inc. v. City of Fridley 135 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1965
7 Rule 52.01 provides: “In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury * * * the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon and direct the entry of the appropriate judgment * * 8 Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 *194 N. W. (2d) 656.
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
There are other housing authority cases, such as Asch v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N. W. (2d) 656 , and Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Minneapolis Metropolitan Co. 259 Minn. 1 , 104 N. W. (2d) 864 , which add nothing to the present discussion.
The Kelmar Corp. v. District Court 130 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1964
The Kelmar Corp. v. District Court 130 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1964
Paul, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N. W. (2d) 656 .
Grobe v. Oak Center Creamery Co. 113 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1962
Grobe v. Oak Center Creamery Co. 113 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1962
4 Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Minneapolis Metropolitan Co. 259 Minn. 1 , 104 N. W. (2d) 864 ; Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Greenman, 255 Minn. 396 , 96 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 234 Minn. 221 , 48 N. W. (2d) 175 ; Asch v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N. W. (2d) *63 656; In re Condemnation by Dairyland Power Co-op.
Allen v. Village of Savage 112 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1961
Allen v. Village of Savage 112 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1961
In Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146, 155 , 97 N. W. (2d) 656, 664 , we said: “* * * Clearly, findings by the trial court were mandatory.
County of Big Stone v. Village of Appleton 112 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1961
County of Big Stone v. Village of Appleton 112 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1961
The following authorities also support the doctrine above expressed: Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N. W. (2d) 656 ; Robinson v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. 238 N. Y. 271 , 144 N. E. 579 , 36 A. L. R. 1310.
HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co. 104 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1960
HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co. 104 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1960
Paul, 256 Minn. 146 , 97 N. W. (2d) 656 , we discussed at some length the development of state and Federal statutes relating to housing, redevelopment, and urban renewal projects.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by