Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 101 N.W.2d 200.

75 citing documents.

Daniel Johnson (A23-0543), Relator v. Concrete Treatments, Inc., and Technology Insurance Company, and ... 7 N.W.3d 119 Minn. 2024
Daniel Johnson (A23-0543), Relator v. Concrete Treatments, Inc., and Technology Insurance Company, and ... 7 N.W.3d 119 Minn. 2024
Gillette v. Harold, Inc.
Neomi Schmidt, Minn. 2023
In August 2019, 3 “A Gillette injury occurs when the cumulative effects of minute, repetitive trauma are serious enough to disable an employee.” n.1 (Minn. 2016); see also Gillette v. Harold, Inc., –07 (Minn. 1960) 4 Schmidt quit her job at Wal-Mart and started working as a bus aide, but Schmidt quit her bus-aide job in March 2020 because it aggravated her knees.
Margaret Leuthard, Minn. 2021
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 206–07 (Minn. 1960) (explaining that covered workers’ compensation injuries are not exclusively injuries attributable to a single incident, but may also be repetitive stress injuries).1 For the next four years, Leuthard underwent multiple diagnostic efforts, including many MRIs, and tried various treatments
Noga v. Minn. Vikings Football Club 931 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 2019
Noga v. Minn. Vikings Football Club 931 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 2019
510 (Minn. 1987) (explaining that a Gillette injury is "a personal injury arising out of and in the course of employment as a result of the cumulative effect of repetitive minute trauma over a period of time"); Gillette v. Harold, Inc. , 257 Minn. 313 , , 206 (1960).
Virgenia M. Ryan v. Potlatch Corporation and Self-Insured/Comp Cost, Inc., Relators. 882 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2016
Virgenia M. Ryan v. Potlatch Corporation and Self-Insured/Comp Cost, Inc., Relators. 882 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2016
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 315
Curtis B. Braatz v. Parsons Electric Company and Zurich North America/GAB Robins, Inc., Relators. 850 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2014
Curtis B. Braatz v. Parsons Electric Company and Zurich North America/GAB Robins, Inc., Relators. 850 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2014
3 See Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313
Anderson v. Frontier Communications 819 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2012
Anderson v. Frontier Communications 819 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2012
See Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 320-22 , -06 (1960) (holding that when a preexisting infirmity is aggravated by repetitive minute trauma as a result of the ordinary and necessary duties of employment, the disability resulting from such aggravation is compensable as a personal injury under the workers’ compensation statute).
Reider v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11 728 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2007
Reider v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11 728 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2007
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 317-22 , -07 (1960) (holding *248 that where a preexisting infirmity is aggravated by repetitive trauma as a result of the ordinary and necessary duties of employment, the disability resulting from such aggravation is compensable as a personal injury under the workers’ compensation statute).
Vezina v. Best Western Inn Maplewood 627 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 2001
Vezina v. Best Western Inn Maplewood 627 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 2001
See Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 321-22 , (holding employee suffered compensable injury where disability of foot was aggravated by constant and continued use in performing the ordinary and necessary duties of employment).
Silva v. Maplewood Care Center 582 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1998
Silva v. Maplewood Care Center 582 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1998
See, e.g., Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 322
Steffen v. Target Stores 517 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1994
Steffen v. Target Stores 517 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1994
In Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313 , we held that an employee who is injured gradually by reason of the duties of employment and eventually becomes disabled is, under our workers’ compensation law, no less the recipient of a compensable injury than one who suffered a single disabling trauma: It is well established by the authorit
Felton v. Anton Chevrolet 513 N.W.2d 457 Minn. 1994
Felton v. Anton Chevrolet 513 N.W.2d 457 Minn. 1994
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 321-22 , -06 (1960) (where a preexisting infirmity is aggravated by repetitive minute trauma as a result of the ordinary and necessary duties of employment, the disability resulting from such aggravation is compensable as a personal injury under the workers' compensation statute).
Senser v. Minnesota Vikings Football 474 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1991
Senser v. Minnesota Vikings Football 474 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1991
See Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313
Jones v. Thermo King 461 N.W.2d 915 Minn. 1990
Jones v. Thermo King 461 N.W.2d 915 Minn. 1990
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313
Sundquist v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc. 456 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 1990
Sundquist v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc. 456 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 1990
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 321-22 , -06 (1960) (where a preexisting infirmity is aggravated by repetitive minute trauma as a result of the ordinary and necessary duties of employment, the disability resulting from such aggravation is compensable as a personal injury under the workers' compensation statute).
Dille v. Knox Lumber/Division of Southwest Forest 452 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1990
Kulp v. Sheraton Ritz Hotel 450 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1990
DeNardo v. Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital 450 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1990
DeNardo v. Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital 450 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1990
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 321-22 , -06 (1960) (where a preexisting infirmity is aggravated by repetitive minute trauma as a result of the ordinary and necessary duties of employment, the disability resulting from such aggravation is compensable as a personal injury under the workers’ compensation statute).
Kulp v. Sheraton Ritz Hotel 450 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1990
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 321-22 , -06 (1960) (where a preexisting infirmity is aggravated by repetitive minute trauma as a result of the ordinary and necessary duties of employment, the disability resulting from such aggravation is compensable as a personal injury under the workers’ compensation statute).
Tolzmann v. McCombs-Knutson Associates 447 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1989
Tolzmann v. McCombs-Knutson Associates 447 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1989
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 317
Fielding v. George A. Hormel & Co. 439 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1989
Fielding v. George A. Hormel & Co. 439 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1989
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313
Olson v. Executive Travel MSP, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1989
Olson v. Executive Travel MSP, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1989
See Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 317 , see generally, Kirwin, Compensation for Disease Under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Law, 6 Wm.
Marose v. Maislin Transport 413 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1987
Marose v. Maislin Transport 413 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1987
He also amended his claim to allege a Gillette injury resulting from his work activity from February 6, 1981, to July 27, 1982—i.e., a personal injury arising out of and in the course of employment as a result of the cumulative effect of repetitive minute trauma over a period of time, see Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313, 321-23 , -07 (1960).
McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co. 336 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1983
McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co. 336 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1983
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313
Holliday v. Rush Products Division of Lake Center Industries 284 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1979
Holliday v. Rush Products Division of Lake Center Industries 284 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1979
Gillette v. Harold, Inc. 257 Minn. 313
Zingelman v. Wisniewski 265 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1978
Zingelman v. Wisniewski 265 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1978
See, also, Gillette v. Harold’s, Inc., 257 Minn. 313 , Forseen v. Tire Retread Co., Inc., 271 Minn. 399
Newcomb v. Richfield Yards, Inc. 255 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1977
Newcomb v. Richfield Yards, Inc. 255 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1977
Gillette v. Harold, Inc., 257 Minn. 313 , Johnson v. Armour & Co., 297 Minn. 510 , Meyers v. Electro-Static Finishers, Inc., 303 Minn. 508
Jensen v. Kronick's Floor Covering Service 245 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1976