Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 104 N.W.2d 661.

42 citing documents.

Margaret Liao, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Consideration exists when a contractual promise is the product of a bargained-for exchange, such as “an obligation by one party upon condition of an act or forbearance of an act by the other.”
Blue Sky Real Estate, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Valid consideration “requires that a contractual promise be the product of a bargain.” Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp.
Christopher Christopherson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
For this premise, Christopherson cites Baehr v. Penn -O-Tex Oil Corp., as well as two unpublished opinions of this court and one opinion from another jurisdiction.
Andrew Carufel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Consideration must be the result of a bargain, and is “es sential evidence of the parties’ intent to create a legal obligation.”
K&S Heating, Air Conditioning & Plumbing, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Baehr v. Penn -O-Tex Oil Corp. , 258 Minn. 533, 5 38–39
In the Matter of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Special Permit No. 16868 (December 21, 2012) issued to … 867 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Special Permit No. 16868 (December 21, 2012) issued to … 867 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 536, (stating that “[p]ossession is a chameleon-like term which takes its meaning from its context both in common speech and in legal terminology” (quotation omitted)); Jacobson v. Aetna Cas.
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
“Consideration requires that one party to a transaction voluntarily assume an obligation on the condition of an act or forbearance by the other party.” U.S. Sprint Commc’ns Co., Ltd. v. Comm’r of Revenue, d 752, 754 (Minn. 1998); see also Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 539, (explaining that consideration “insures that the promise enforced as a contract is not accidental, casual, or gratuitous, but has been uttered intentionally as the result of some deliberation, manifested by rec
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
See Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 538
Bob Acres, LLC v. Schumacher Farms, LLC 797 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Bob Acres, LLC v. Schumacher Farms, LLC 797 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 538-39
State v. Spence 768 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 2009
Distinguished State v. Spence 768 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 2009
We also reject Spence’s reliance on State v. Simion, which interprets possession within the context of theft of movable property to include both constructive and actual possession: “Constructive possession 'is usually said to mean the legal right to possession which follows from title without actual possession.’ ” , 841-42 (Minn.2008) (quoting Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 537 , ).
Southcross Commerce Center, LLP v. Tupy Properties, LLC 766 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Southcross Commerce Center, LLP v. Tupy Properties, LLC 766 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
at 834-35 ; see also *708 Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 583, 536 , (stating that “[a]n assignment occurs where, and only where, a lessee transfers his entire interest” and that “the liability of an assignee arises by privity of estate.”); Anderson v. Ries, 222 Minn. 408, 414 , (“Where a lessee transfers the whole term for which premises were leas
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 538-39 , see also Deli v. Hasselmo, 542 * review denied (Minn. Apr.
State v. Simion 745 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 2008
State v. Simion 745 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 2008
Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 537
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 538
Estate of Peterson 579 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Estate of Peterson 579 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 538-39 , (footnote omitted).
Bartl v. Kenyon 549 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bartl v. Kenyon 549 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil, 258 Minn. 533, 538-39
Chalmers v. Kanawyer 544 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Chalmers v. Kanawyer 544 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(citing Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533 , ).
Deli v. Hasselmo 542 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Deli v. Hasselmo 542 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 538-39
Concordia College Corp. v. Salvation Army 470 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Concordia College Corp. v. Salvation Army 470 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“Consideration requires that a contractual promise be the product of a bargain.” Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533, 538
Knese v. Heidgerken 358 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Knese v. Heidgerken 358 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
A sale or barter of liquor involves a bargained-for exchange — i.e. consideration, which is “the voluntary assumption of an obligation by one party on the condition of *180 an act or forebearance by the other.” Cady, d at 596, citing Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533 , and 1 A. Corbin, Corbin on Contracts § 116 (1963) (emphasis in original).
Cady v. Coleman 315 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1982
Cady v. Coleman 315 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1982
Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp., 258 Minn. 533 , see 1 A. Corbin, Corbin on Contracts § 116 (West 1963).
Independent Gin Co., Inc. v. Parker 508 P.2d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Stanley Trucking Co. v. National Indemnity Co. 136 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1965
Stanley Trucking Co. v. National Indemnity Co. 136 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1965
See, Minneapolis Land Co. v. McMillan, 79 Minn. 287 , ; Thayer v. Estate of Pray, 111 Minn. 449 , ; Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp. 258 Minn. 533 , 104 N. W. (2d) 661 ; 4 Dunnell, Dig.
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood 117 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1962
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood 117 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1962
practical problems of contractual definition of the basic elements, were recently undertaken in Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp. 258 Minn. 533 , 104 N. W. (2d) 661 .