Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368.

138 citing documents.

Jacquelyn Karre, et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
at 874 (citing Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc., (overruling one of the five indemnity rules explained in Hendrickson v. Minn. Power & Light Co., and highlighting that the supreme court distinguishes between common-law and contractual indemnification)); see also In re Indiv.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
White argues that before Minnesota statutes 11 authorized restitution, “district courts ordered restitution as a condition of probation for theft and forged checks convictions.” The state asserts that “the principles that power the restitution statute existed at common law,” citing Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.
Hermann Horst, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
at 798 -99 (recognizing that third -party tortfe asor was manufacturer who had duty to provide reasonably safe product); see also Hendrickson v. Minn. Power & Light Co., d 843, 847-48 (Minn. 1960) (holding that, because no common liability exist s between an employer, who is immune from tort liability, and a third-party tortfeasor, no statutory right of contribution exists ), overruled in part on other grounds by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc., .
Christina Ginther, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Hendrickson v. Minn. Power & Light Co., , overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc.
Frederick S. Fish, Minn. 2019
Our leading case was Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., overruled in part on other grounds by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc.
Minn. 2019
332, 345 (D. Minn. 1999); Hendrickson v. Minn. Power & Light Co., overruled in part on other grounds, Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc.
Fish v. Ramler Trucking, Inc. 923 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Fish v. Ramler Trucking, Inc. 923 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Hendrickson v. Minn. Power & Light Co. , 258 Minn. 368 , , 849 (1960), overruled in part on other grounds by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc.
Dewitt v. London Rd. Rental Ctr., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2018
Dewitt v. London Rd. Rental Ctr., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2018
Hendrickson v. Minn. Power & Light Co. , 258 Minn. 368 , , 848 (1960), overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc. , , 366-67 (Minn. 1977).
In re the Estate of: Barbara Jean LaPoint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of: Barbara Jean LaPoint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hendrickson v. Minn. Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 371, overruled in part on other grounds by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus.
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
& Sons, (explaining that a party is entitled to indemnification for its liability " '[wjhere the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability because of a breach of duty owed to him by the one sought to be charged' ” (quoting Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc., )); Hendrickson v. Minn. Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368 , 371, (stating that "indemnity is appropriate where one party has a primary or greater liability or duty which justly requires him to bear the whole of the burden as between t
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2011
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2011
Contribution is an equitable remedy that allows “one who has discharged more than his fair share of a common liability or burden to recover from another who is also liable the proportionate share which the other should pay or bear.” Hendrickson v. Minn. Power and Light Co., 258 Minn. 368 , 370
Roemhildt v. Gresser Companies, Inc. 729 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2007
Roemhildt v. Gresser Companies, Inc. 729 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2007
Contribution rests upon principles of equity.’ ” Lambertson v. Cincinnati Welding Corp., 312 Minn. 114, 123 , -86 (1977) (quoting Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 370 , ).
Engvall v. Soo Line Railroad Co. 632 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 2001
Engvall v. Soo Line Railroad Co. 632 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 2001
In Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368 , this court clarified the situations in which one joint tortfeasor may obtain indemnity from another joint tortfeasor.
Senn v. Youngstedt 589 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Senn v. Youngstedt 589 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
The right to pursue a contribution action “is regarded as maturing when [a party] has *316 paid more than [its] share of the debt, and until that time there is neither equitable obligation nor implied contract to make contribution.” See also Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 370 , (“Contribution is the remedy securing the right of one who has discharged more than his fair share of a common liability or burden to recover from another who is also liable the proportiona
Minnesota Brewing Co. v. Egan & Sons Co. 560 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Minnesota Brewing Co. v. Egan & Sons Co. 560 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Contribution is appropriate where there is a common liability among the parties, whereas indemnity is appropriate where one party has a primary or greater liability or duty which justly requires him to bear the whole of the burden as between the parties.” Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114, 128-24 , -86 (1977) (quoting Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 370-71 , -47 (I960)).
Decker v. Brunkow 557 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Decker v. Brunkow 557 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 374-75 , , 368 n. 11 (Minn.1977).
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
Id.; Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 371 , -47 (1960), overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc., , 368 n. 11 (1977).
Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 371 , -47 (1960), overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc., , 368 n. 11 (1977).
Hahn v. Tri-Line Farmers Co-Op 478 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hahn v. Tri-Line Farmers Co-Op 478 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
at 128 , d at 688 (quoting Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 374 , ).
Schuler v. Meschke 435 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Schuler v. Meschke 435 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Respondents’ complaint alleges that they were exposed to the liability of Industrial Indemnity on the grower agreements “solely because of appellants’ wrongful acts and omissions in concealing from Beneficial and Industrial Indemnity the circumstances under which the grower agreements were obtained.” In Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368 , the supreme court explained the nature of the remedy of indemnity.
Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 418 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1988
Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 418 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1988
Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 372 , 104 N.W.
Eustis v. David Agency, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Eustis v. David Agency, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 370 , (contribution is right of one party who has discharged greater share of common liability to recover from another party who is also liable for proportionate share).
Hoffmann v. Wiltscheck 411 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hoffmann v. Wiltscheck 411 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co., 219 Minn. 8, 12 , see also Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 372 , (indemnity rights of one with only a derivative or vicarious liability), overruled in part, Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.
Shore v. Minneapolis Auto Auction, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Shore v. Minneapolis Auto Auction, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The law of indemnification was discussed in depth by the Minnesota Supreme Court in Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368 , overruled in part by Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.
Boulevard Del, Inc. v. Stillman 386 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Boulevard Del, Inc. v. Stillman 386 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 371
Marriage of Maskrey v. Maskrey 380 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Maskrey v. Maskrey 380 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The Minnesota Supreme Court has defined the remedy of indemnity as “the right of a person to recover reimbursement from another for the discharge of a liability which, as between himself and the other, should have been discharged by the other.” Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power and Light Company, 258 Minn. 368 , 370, (footnote omitted).
Zontelli & Sons, Inc. v. City of Nashwauk 373 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1985
Zontelli & Sons, Inc. v. City of Nashwauk 373 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1985
A party is entitled to be indemnified for its liability “[wjhere the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability because of a breach of duty owed to him by the one sought to be charged.” Tolbert v. Gerber Indus., Inc., Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co., 258 Minn. 368, 373
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Under Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power and Light Co., 258 Minn. 368 , a person may seek indemnity who: has incurred liability by action at the direction, in the interest of, and in reliance upon the one sought to be charged.