Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nehring v. Bast, 103 N.W.2d 368.

31 citing documents.

A p p e l l a n t s , Minn. 2020
); Burkel v. Pro-Vid-All Mills, Inc. , (holding a feed company liable to pay the salary of a turkey salesman based on the statements of the company’s apparent agent); –63 (Minn. 1963) (holding a fertilizer manufacturer and distributor liable for a contract made by an apparent agent); d 368, 376 (Minn. 1960) (holding an insuran ce company liable for the negligence of an apparent agent); Temple, Brissman & Co. v. Greater St.
Writers, Inc. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Writers, Inc. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193, 199-200
Quinlivan v. Emcasco Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Quinlivan v. Emcasco Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
2d 154, 157-58 (1973); Hockmeyer v. Pooler, 268 Minn. 551, 562 , (apparent authority will be found where the principal holds the agent out as possessing authority or knowingly permits an agent to assume authority, and the party dealing with the agent has actual knowledge the agent was held out as having such authority by the principal); Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193, 199-200 , (actual authority is that authority which the principal directly grants to the agent; apparent authority is authority w
Cooney v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 397 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cooney v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 397 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , the supreme court held that the insurance company was estopped from denying coverage because its agent had orally promised the insured that he would automatically renew his coverage.
St. Paul School District No. 625 v. Columbia Transit Corp. 321 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1982
St. Paul School District No. 625 v. Columbia Transit Corp. 321 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1982
at 104 , d at 357 (quoting Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193, 203
Ives v. Sunfish Sign Co., Inc. 275 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1979
Ives v. Sunfish Sign Co., Inc. 275 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1979
454, 457 , Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193, 202 , T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Russell, 214 Miss.
Lampert Yards, Inc. v. Thompson-Wetterling Construction & Realty, Inc. 223 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1974
Lampert Yards, Inc. v. Thompson-Wetterling Construction & Realty, Inc. 223 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1974
The trial court cited Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , for the principle that whenever one of two innocent persons must suffer by the acts of a third, he who by his conduct, act, or omission has allowed such third person to occasion the loss must sustain it.
Pesina Ex Rel. Pesina v. Juarez 181 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
Pesina Ex Rel. Pesina v. Juarez 181 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
The Morrison case clearly indicates that express authority from the principal is not necessary as a condition precedent to bind the principal and is consistent with this court’s position as stated in Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 .
MacNamara v. Boyd Trust 177 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1970
MacNamara v. Boyd Trust 177 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1970
Torrey v. Midland Cooperatives, Inc. 253 Minn. 489 , 93 N. W. (2d) 135 ; Schwerzler v. Frankamp, 255 Minn. 95 , 95 N. W. (2d) 503 ; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 ; Fogarty v. Martin Hotel Co. 257 Minn. 398 , 101 N. W. (2d) 601 ; Bennett v. Bartlett, 258 Minn. 159 , 103 N. W. (2d) 194 ; Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 ; Roberts v. Motor Cargo, Inc. 258 Min
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Bierwerth 175 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1970
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Bierwerth 175 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1970
See, Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 , 85 A. L. R. (2d) 1400.
Dukeman v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 174 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1970
Dukeman v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 174 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1970
Co. 148 Minn. 255 , , 17 Minn. L. Rev. 572 ; Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 , 85 A. L. R. (2d) 1400.
Julien v. Spring Lake Park Agency, Inc. 166 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1969
Julien v. Spring Lake Park Agency, Inc. 166 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1969
Co. (8 Cir.) 61 F. (2d) 264, 272, 92 A. L. R. 218, 232, quoted by this court in Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193, 203 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368, 376 , 85 A. L. R. (2d) 1400: “* * * The exigencies of modem business require and justify reliance on oral agreements of insurance entered into by agents acting with apparent authority.” With respect to the issue of indemnity, the trial court was correct in holding that Ohio has failed to sho
Oster v. Riley 150 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1967
Oster v. Riley 150 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1967
4 See, Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 , 85 A. L. R. (2d) 1400; Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Ins.
Jeanette Frocks, Inc. v. First Produce State Bank 137 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1965
Jeanette Frocks, Inc. v. First Produce State Bank 137 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1965
1 Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 , 85 A. L. R. (2d) 1400.
Hickory v. Hickory Insulation Co. 134 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1965
Hickory v. Hickory Insulation Co. 134 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1965
Kundiger v. Waldorf Paper Products Co. 218 Minn. 168 , 15 N. W. (2d) 486 ; Swanson v. American Hoist & Derrick Co. 214 Minn. 323 , 8 N. W. (2d) 24 ; Sorensen v. P. H. Thompson & Son, 248 Minn. 280 , 79 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 , 85 A. L. R. (2d) 1400; Schmoll v. J. W. Craig Co. 228 Minn. 429 , 37 N. W. (2d) 539 .
Humenik v. Siwek 124 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1963
Humenik v. Siwek 124 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1963
Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 , 85 A. L. R. (2d) 1400; Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire Ins.