Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Dehler, 102 N.W.2d 696.

29 citing documents.

In Re the Civil Commitment of Giem 742 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 2007
In Re the Civil Commitment of Giem 742 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 2007
In a criminal case, the “right to a speedy trial is intended to avoid oppression and prevent delay by imposing upon the courts an obligation to proceed with reasonable dispatch.” State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549, 556
In Re the Welfare of J.C.P. 716 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Welfare of J.C.P. 716 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
1 (2004) (providing that “the juvenile court has original and exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerning any child who is alleged to be delinquent”); State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549, 554-55 , (noting that the Juvenile Court Act requires “that a juvenile be brought before the juvenile court and that certain proceedings take place in that court before the district court can acquire jurisdiction”).
State v. Rojas 569 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Rojas 569 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
see also State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549, 556 , (permitting district court to try uncertified ease when violation occurred while individual was- under age 18 but not apprehended until after age twenty-one).
Matter of Anj 521 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In re the Welfare of A.N.J. 521 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Matter of Anj 521 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549, 555-56 , C.A.N., d at 442 .
In re the Welfare of A.N.J. 521 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549, 555-56 , C.A.N., d at 442 .
State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Benson 495 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Benson 495 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
3172 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976); State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549, 561 , (life sentence is a minimum term less time which “would be” allowed for good conduct).
State v. Dwire 409 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1987
State v. Dwire 409 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1987
Defendants claim State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 649 , holds to the contrary.
In Re the Welfare of C.A.N. 370 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of C.A.N. 370 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549, 556
In Re the Welfare of S. V. 296 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1980
In Re the Welfare of S. V. 296 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1980
In State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549 , the act was allegedly committed at age 16 and the prosecution was at age 34.
State v. Brady 594 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1978
State v. Dugan 211 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1973
State v. Dugan 211 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1973
The state in opposition to defendant’s petition cites State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549, 556 , where we said : «* * * [U]nder [Minn. St.
Eyman v. Superior Court in and for County of Pinal 448 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Superior Court of Pima County 436 P.2d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Dehler 115 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1962
State v. Dehler 115 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1962
In its opinion with respect thereto, State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549 , 102 N. W. (2d) 696 , this court determined such questions as follows: (1) The District Court of Morrison County had jurisdiction to arraign and try defendant for the offense charged under the indictment returned December 30, 1941; (2) Where the offense was committed prior to the time defendant was 18 years of age, b
State v. Robinson 114 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1962
State v. Robinson 114 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1962
State v. Artz, 154 Minn. 290 , ; State v. McTague, 173 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549, 556 , 102 N. W. (2d) 696, 702 ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. McGregor v. Rigg 109 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1961
State Ex Rel. McGregor v. Rigg 109 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1961
State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549 , 102 N. W. (2d) 696 ; State ex rel.