Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Guy, 105 N.W.2d 892.

34 citing documents.

State v. Clark 755 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 2008
State v. Clark 755 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 2008
Our decision in State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67 , is instructive on this point.
State v. Swanson 707 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2006
State v. Swanson 707 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2006
-16 (Minn.2004); State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67, 74
State v. Black 291 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1980
State v. Black 291 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1980
39 , 17 L.Ed.2d 66 (1966); State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67
Colby v. Gibbons 276 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1979
Colby v. Gibbons 276 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1979
In order for a party to impeach his own witness, he cannot merely be disappointed by the response of the witness, see, State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67 , he must be genuinely surprised, see, State v. Saporen, 205 Minn. 358 , 285 N.W.
State v. Knaffla 243 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1976
State v. Knaffla 243 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1976
State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67
State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67
Wild v. Rarig 234 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1975
Wild v. Rarig 234 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1975
This applies to criminal as well as civil cases.” Whether or not there is genuine surprise “presents a preliminary question for determination by the trial court, and ordinarily we will not reverse unless there is an abuse of discretion.” State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67, 73
State v. Spencer 216 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1974
State v. Spencer 216 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1974
State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67
State v. Johnson 184 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1971
State v. Johnson 184 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1971
Whether or not there is genuine surprise, as we stated in State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67, 73 , 105 N. W. (2d) 892, 897 , “presents a preliminary question for determination by the trial court, and ordinarily we will not reverse unless there is an abuse of discretion.” The use made of Bradford’s prior inconsistent *349 statement is not subject to criticism on any other ground.
State v. Jones 152 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1967
State v. Jones 152 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1967
No request was made for such instruction and, while certainly it should have been given, we have held, in State v. Soltau, 212 Minn. 20 , 2 N. W. (2d) 155 , and State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67 , 105 N. W. (2d) 892 , that failure to give such instruction in the absence of a request is not reversible error.
State v. Sorg 144 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1966
State v. Sorg 144 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1966
State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67 , 105 N. W. (2d) 892 .
State Ex Rel. Ogg v. Tahash 140 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Ogg v. Tahash 140 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1966
State v. Connelly, 249 Minn. 429 , 82 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State v. Soltau, 212 Minn. 20 , 2 N. W. (2d) 155 ; State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67 , 105 N. W. (2d) 892 ; State v. McLaughlin, 250 Minn. 309 , 84 N. W. (2d) 664 .
State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
proof was all that was required to let in evidence of a coconspirator’s acts and declaration, done or made in furtherance of the common purpose, to implicate any other coconspirator.” The same rule is followed in State v. Evans, 88 Minn. 262 , ; State v. Tennyson, 212 Minn. 158 , 2 N. W. (2d) 833 , 139 A. L. R. 987; State v. Connelly, 249 Minn. 429 , 82 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67 , 105 N. W. (2d) 892 .
State v. Jordan 136 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1965
State v. Jordan 136 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1965
See, State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67 , 105 N. W. (2d) 892 ; State v. Connelly, 249 Minn. 429 , 82 N. W. (2d) 489 .
State v. Rasmussen 128 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1964
State v. Rasmussen 128 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1964
In this situation we cannot hold that the instruction challenged constituted reversible error, particularly where the verdict appears supported by substantial evidence, State v. Billington, 241 Minn. 418 , 63 N. W. (2d) 387 ; State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67 , 105 N. W. (2d) 892 ; and where no request was made to modify or correct it before the case went to the jury.
State v. Currie 126 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1964
State v. Currie 126 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1964
10 See, State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67 , 105 N. W. (2d) 892 .
State v. Dahlgren 107 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1961
State v. Dahlgren 107 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1961
2 State v. Gulbrandsen, 238 Minn. 508 , 57 N. W. (2d) 419 ; State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67 , 105 N. W. (2d) 892 .