DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co., 104 N.W.2d 519.

38 citing documents.

  • Hagen v. City of Fergus Falls 313 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1981
  • Hagen v. City of Fergus Falls 313 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1981
    DeHaan v. Farmers Union Marketing & Processing Assn., 302 Minn. 552 , (per curiam); McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co., 258 Minn. 336, 347
  • Quirk v. Electric Machinery Manufacturing Co. 236 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1975
  • Quirk v. Electric Machinery Manufacturing Co. 236 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1975
    Dicta in McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336, 347 , however, in referring to injuries to two separate members as constituting only one physical impairment, stated: “The 1957 amendment uses the term ‘physical impairment’ and defines it, and it therefore appears clear that the employee’s head and back injuries and the conditions resul
  • Miller v. Norris Creameries 235 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1975
  • Miller v. Norris Creameries 235 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1975
    Co. 300 Minn. 1 , Beson v. Carleton College, 271 Minn. 268 , McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336
  • DeHaan v. Farmers Union Marketing & Processing Ass'n 225 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1975
  • DeHaan v. Farmers Union Marketing & Processing Ass'n 225 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1975
    We have previously indicated that the “physical impairment” contemplated by the second injury statute is one which will be “a continuing obstacle to * * * obtaining employment.” McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336, 347
  • Sandal v. TALLMAN OIL COMPANY 214 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1974
  • Sandal v. TALLMAN OIL COMPANY 214 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1974
    case in which an award was based upon a settlement, we considered what constitutes cause under § 176.461: “In determining whether or not the reopening was ‘for cause,’ we have noted that it is a well-settled rule in Minnesota that ‘[w]hether there exists sufficient cause to justify vacation of award ordinarily rests in the sound discretion of the commission.’ McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336, 343
  • Walker v. Midwest Foods 197 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1972
  • Walker v. Midwest Foods 197 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1972
    In determining whether or not the reopening was “for cause,” we have noted that it is a well-settled rule in Minnesota that “[wjhether there exists sufficient cause to justify vacation of award ordinarily rests in the sound discretion of the commission.” McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336, 343
  • MacNamara v. Boyd Trust 177 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1970
  • MacNamara v. Boyd Trust 177 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1970
    ves, Inc. 253 Minn. 489 , 93 N. W. (2d) 135 ; Schwerzler v. Frankamp, 255 Minn. 95 , 95 N. W. (2d) 503 ; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 ; Fogarty v. Martin Hotel Co. 257 Minn. 398 , 101 N. W. (2d) 601 ; Bennett v. Bartlett, 258 Minn. 159 , 103 N. W. (2d) 194 ; Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 ; Roberts v. Motor Cargo, Inc. 258 Minn. 425 , 104 N. W. (2d) 546
  • McCrae v. Brandt Aero Service 168 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1969
  • McCrae v. Brandt Aero Service 168 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1969
    Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 ; and Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22 .
  • Salmon v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY 161 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 1968
  • Salmon v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY 161 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 1968
    Co. 230 Minn. 315 , 41 N. W. (2d) 433 ; Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 ; Reese v. Preston Marketing Assn. 274 Minn. 150 , 142 N. W. (2d) 721 .
  • Reese v. Preston Marketing Association 142 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1966
  • Reese v. Preston Marketing Association 142 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1966
    Co. 230 Minn. 315, 319 , 41 N. W. (2d) 433, 436 ; Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214, 219 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266, 269 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336, 342 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519, 524 .
  • Haverland v. Twin City Milk Producers Ass'n 142 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1966
  • Haverland v. Twin City Milk Producers Ass'n 142 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1966
    McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336, 347 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519, 527 .
  • Beson v. Carleton College 136 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1965
  • Beson v. Carleton College 136 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1965
    176.13 was “undoubtedly intended to encourage the employment of physically handicapped persons by relieving employers of part of their liability for compensation through transferring part of such liability to the special compensation fund.” McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336, 347 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519, 527 .
  • Petter v. K. W. McKee, Inc. 133 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1965
  • Petter v. K. W. McKee, Inc. 133 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1965
    of performing.’ We chose rather to hold that ‘although an injured person may be able to perform some parts of an occupation he may be held to be totally disabled unless he is able to perform the substantial and material parts of some gainful work or occupation with reasonable continuity.’ ” For other cases involving a finding of total permanent disability, see McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 ; Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393 , 115 N. W. (2d)
  • Boltz v. ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANY 131 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1964
  • Boltz v. ARMOUR AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANY 131 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1964
    TMs same argument was advanced in McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 , on facts similar in many respects to those here involved.
  • Wold v. Decca Distributing Company 130 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1964
  • Wold v. Decca Distributing Company 130 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1964
    Anderson v. Sandberg Poultry Farm, 263 Minn. 360 , 116 N. W. (2d) 585 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 ; Dudansky v. L, H. Sault Const. Co. 244 Minn. 369 , 70 N. W. (2d) 114 ; Wallace v. Leitzen, 243 Minn. 481 , 68 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Guptill v. Conlon Const. Co. 239 Minn. 185 , 58 N. W. (2d) 264 ; Bomersine v. Armour & Co. 225 Minn. 157 , 30 N. W. (2d) 526 .
  • Martin v. Swift & Company 130 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1964
  • Martin v. Swift & Company 130 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1964
    3 Haskin v. County of Hennepin, 268 Minn. 21 , 127 N. W. (2d) 522 ; Engel v. Starry, 268 Minn. 252 , 128 N. W. (2d) 874 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336, 344 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519, 526 .
  • Peterson v. Dairy Distributors, Inc. 129 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1964
  • Peterson v. Dairy Distributors, Inc. 129 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1964
    Luna v. Armour & Co. 259 Minn. 48 , 105 N. W. (2d) 689 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 .
  • Hegdahl v. City of Minneapolis 129 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1964
  • Hegdahl v. City of Minneapolis 129 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1964
    3 See, Luthens v. Glencoe Red & White Store, 264 Minn. 26 , 117 N. W. (2d) 386 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 .
  • Jacobson v. Uptown Transfer & Storage Co. 129 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1964
  • Jacobson v. Uptown Transfer & Storage Co. 129 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1964
    157 , 30 N. W. (2d) 526 ; Batchelder v. Northwestern Hanna Fuel Co. 225 Minn. 250 , 30 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Guptill v. Conlon Const. Co. 239 Minn. 185 , 58 N. W. (2d) 264 ; Wallace v. Leitzen, 243 Minn. 481 , 68 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Dudansky v. L. H. Sault Const. Co. 244 Minn. 369 , 70 N. W. (2d) 114 ; Nelson v. C. F. Scully Const. Co. 252 Minn. 518 , 90 N. W. (2d) 903 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool 6 Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 ; Anderson v. Sandberg Poultry Farm, 263 Minn. 360 , 116 N. W. (2d