Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 103 N.W.2d 397.

34 citing documents.

Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 868 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2015
Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 868 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2015
When a taxpayer presents substantial evidence that the Commissioner’s assessment order is invalid or incorrect, the presumption of validity is overcome, and the case is “decided by the trier of fact the same as if the presumption had never existed.” See Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221, 228, (quoting Ogren v. City of Duluth, 219 Minn. 555, 563, ); accord Minn. R. Evid.
Stillson v. Peterson & Hede Co. 454 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1990
Stillson v. Peterson & Hede Co. 454 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1990
For purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Act, however, an employee is said to have “legally contracted” an occupational disease when the disease “interfere[s] with bodily functions to such an extent that the employee can no longer substantially perform the duties of his employment.” Dunn, d at 575 [quoting Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221, 226 , ].
State ex rel. Burgess v. Burgess 396 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State ex rel. Burgess v. Burgess 396 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221, 227
Dunn v. Vic Manufacturing Co. 327 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1982
Dunn v. Vic Manufacturing Co. 327 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1982
from a medical standpoint the disease was “contracted” during that time, we have held that a progressive occupational disease is legally contracted, not with the first appearance of symptoms, but “when it manifests itself so as to interfere with bodily functions to such an extent that the employee can no longer substantially perform the duties of his employment.” Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221, 226 , *576
Linnell v. City of St. Louis Park 305 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1981
Linnell v. City of St. Louis Park 305 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1981
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221
Notch v. Victory Granite Co. 238 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1976
Notch v. Victory Granite Co. 238 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1976
Grabowski v. Great Northern Oil Co. 283 Minn. 205 , Fuller v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. 271 Minn. 470 , Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221
Langlais v. Superior Plating, Inc. 226 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 1975
Langlais v. Superior Plating, Inc. 226 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 1975
The question of whether the $60 or the $80 weekly rate applies depends upon the precise time at which the employee became “disabled from earning full wages at the work at which the employee was last employed.” This court said, in Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221, 224 , : “It is obvious that the legislature intended a distinction to be drawn between contracting the disease and ‘disablement.’ The term ‘disablement’ is defined by the legislature and presents no serious difficulty in1
Rosso v. City of Minneapolis 204 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1973
Rosso v. City of Minneapolis 204 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1973
Co. 292 Minn. 450 , Schwartz v. City of Duluth, 264 Minn. 514 , Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221 , Ogren v. City of Duluth, 219 Minn. 555 , Kellerman v. City of St.
Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction Company 197 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1972
Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction Company 197 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1972
4 Kress v. Minneapolis-Moline Co. 258 Minn. 1 , (when disability caused by silicosis takes place); Kalmes v. Kahler Corp. 258 Minn. 105 , (contraction of tuberculosis); Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221, 225, note 4 , (presumption of a fireman’s contracting coronary sclerosis 12 months before the date of disablement).
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 167 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1969
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 167 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1969
3, 1 by our decision in Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221 , 103 N. W. (2d) 397 , Bituminous is not entitled to apportionment as against Hartford and the Workmen’s Compensation Commission must be affirmed.
Fitch v. FARMERS UNION G. TERM. ASS'N (AMBER MILL. D.) 143 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1966
Fitch v. FARMERS UNION G. TERM. ASS'N (AMBER MILL. D.) 143 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1966
See, Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221 , 103 N. W. (2d) 397 , and Ogren v. City of Duluth, 219 Minn. 555 , 18 N. W. (2d) 535 .
Day v. Zenith Paper Stock and Rag Company 134 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1965
Day v. Zenith Paper Stock and Rag Company 134 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1965
Co. 259 Minn. 248 , 107 N. W. (2d) 223 ; Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221 , 103 N. W. (2d) 397 ; Schoch v. Minnesota Min.
Jensen v. City of Duluth 130 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1964
Jensen v. City of Duluth 130 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1964
Paul, 211 Minn. 351 , 1 N. W. (2d) 378 ; Ogren v. City of Duluth, 219 Minn. 555 , 18 N. W. (2d) 535 ; Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221 , 103 N. W. (2d) 397 ; and Schwartz v. City of Duluth, 264 Minn. 514 , 119 N. W. (2d) 822 .
Ulve v. BEMIDJI COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN. 127 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 1964
Ulve v. BEMIDJI COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN. 127 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 1964
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221 , 103 N. W. (2d) 397 ; Kress v. Minneapolis-Moline Co. 258 Minn. 1 , 102 N. W. (2d) 497 ; Gray v. City of St.
Lahti v. M. A. Hanna Co. 120 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1963
Lahti v. M. A. Hanna Co. 120 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1963
Weber v. Printing, Inc. 263 Minn. 403 , 116 N. W. (2d) 569 ; Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221 , 103 N. W. (2d) 397 ; Kellerman v. City of St.
Schwartz v. City of Duluth 119 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1963
Schwartz v. City of Duluth 119 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1963
Paul, 211 Minn. 351 , 1 N. W. (2d) 378 ; and Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221 , 103 N. W. (2d) 397 .
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 115 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1962
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 115 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1962
We made it clear in Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 258 Minn. 221 , 103 N. W. (2d) 397 , that § 176.66, subd.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by