Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 108 N.W.2d 602.

25 citing documents.

Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. Bergstrom 845 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 2014
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2004
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2004
Sch., 259 Minn. 487, 493 , ).
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1992
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1992
In employment contracts, the general rule is that “[t]he measure of damages for breach of an employment contract is the compensation which an employee who has been wrongfully discharged would have received had the contract been carried out according to its terms.” Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 259 Minn. 487, 493 , cited in Pine River, d at 632 .
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 259 Minn. 487, 493
Portlance v. Golden Valley State Bank 405 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1987
Portlance v. Golden Valley State Bank 405 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1987
Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 259 Minn. 487, 493
Atwood v. Independent School District No. 51, Foley 354 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1984
Atwood v. Independent School District No. 51, Foley 354 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1984
Although there is a clear legal distinction between a proposed placement on unrequested leave of absence and actual placement on unrequested leave of absence, see Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 259 Minn. 487 , the only logical construction of the agreement is that notification of proposed placement is required by April 1.
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, Aitkin 349 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, Aitkin 349 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Perry v. Independent School District No. 696, 297 Minn. 197 , the court stated: We held in Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 259 Minn. 487 , that the statute requires notice of proposed termination and not of termination itself and that the requirements of specifying the grounds and of informing the teacher that she could request a hearing must be strictly followed.
Pine River State Bank v. Mettille 333 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1983
Pine River State Bank v. Mettille 333 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1983
Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 259 Minn. 487, 493
Soules v. Independent School District No. 518 258 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1977
Soules v. Independent School District No. 518 258 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1977
*106 In Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 259 Minn. 487 , , 89 A.L.R.2d 1012 (1961), we considered a closely analogous factual situation.
Morey v. Independent School District No. 492 244 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 1976
Morey v. Independent School District No. 492 244 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 1976
See Zeller vs. Prior Lake Public Schools, Independent School District No. 719, Scott County, 259 Minn. 487
Shell v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 811, WABASHA 223 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1974
Shell v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 811, WABASHA 223 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1974
E. g., Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 259 Minn. 487 , Hueman v. Independent School Dist.
Fisher v. Independent School District No. 118 215 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1974
Fisher v. Independent School District No. 118 215 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1974
Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 259 Minn. 487
Perry v. Independent School District No. 696 210 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1973
Perry v. Independent School District No. 696 210 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1973
We held in Zeller v. Prior Lake Public Schools, 259 Minn. 487 , that the statute requires notice of proposed termination and not of termination itself and that the requirements of specifying the grounds and of informing the teacher that she could request a hearing must be strictly followed.