Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 83 N.W.2d 895.

26 citing documents.

Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 332 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1983
Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 332 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1983
Anderson v. Hedges Motor Co., 282 Minn. 217, 220 , Truman v. United Products Corp., 217 Minn. 155, 159-60 , Taylor v. Allstate Insurance Co., 286 Minn. 449, 456-57 , Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7, 12-13
Nordby v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. 329 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1983
Nordby v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. 329 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1983
See, e.g., Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7
Reliance Insurance Co. v. Stack 289 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 1979
Reliance Insurance Co. v. Stack 289 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 1979
See, e. g., Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7, 13 , (action based on insurance clause rather than statute); Truman v. United Products Corp., 217 Minn. 155 , Schultz v. Swift & Co., 210 Minn. 533, 537 , 299 N.W.
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Northstar Mutual Insurance Co. 281 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1979
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Northstar Mutual Insurance Co. 281 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1979
Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7
Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance 239 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
Integrity Mut. Ins. v. S. AUTO. & CAS., ETC. 239 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
Integrity Mut. Ins. v. S. AUTO. & CAS., ETC. 239 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7
Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance 239 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7
Holmgren Ex Rel. Holmgren v. Heisick 178 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1970
Holmgren Ex Rel. Holmgren v. Heisick 178 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1970
Co. supra; Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7 , 83 N. W. (2d) 895 ; Mannheimer Bros. v. The Kansas Cas.
Federal Insurance Company v. Prestemon 153 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1967
Federal Insurance Company v. Prestemon 153 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1967
Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7 , 83 *229 N. W. (2d) 895 ; Corcoran v. The State Auto.
Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. Universal Underwriters Insurance 150 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1967
Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. Universal Underwriters Insurance 150 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1967
Iowa National also contends, under authority of Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7 , 83 N. W. (2d) 895 , that it was relieved of the duty to defend because the amount of damages claimed in the injured party’s complaint was within the limits of the primary insurer’s coverage.
ALLIED MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Nelson 143 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1966
ALLIED MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Nelson 143 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1966
In the case before us the trial court was persuaded by Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7 , 83 N. W. (2d) 895 , which involved an action for declaratory judgment determining the respective liabilities of two automobile insurers in certain actions instituted against the plaintiff and his insured employer for damages arising out of an automobile accident in which the plaintiff was involved while driving the
American Surety Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 142 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1966
American Surety Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 142 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1966
See, Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7 , 83 N. W. (2d) 895 .
Corcoran v. STATE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE ASSN. 98 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1959
Corcoran v. STATE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE ASSN. 98 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1959
*264 It is clear that Western is the primary insurer of the losses arising out of the accident, Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7 , 83 N. W. (2d) 895 ; and Western concedes that under the “omnibus clause” of its policy at the time of the accident its coverage extended to Laqua, the driver of the truck involved therein, as well as to Schouweiler, its owner.
Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America 89 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1958
Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America 89 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1958
In Eicher v. Universal Underwriters, 250 Minn. 7, 13 , 83 N. W. (2d) 895, 899 , involving an issue of coverage between the insurer of an employee who was driving and the insurer of the vehicle owned by the employer, the court said: “The question of division of responsibility between the two insurers is dependent upon a determination as to which policy should be rega