Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Dehning v. Rigg, 86 N.W.2d 723.

69 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Nyrud v. Tahash 115 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1962
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 , and State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Grattan v. Tahash 113 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1962
State Ex Rel. Grattan v. Tahash 113 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1962
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 .
State v. Jacobs 111 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1961
State v. Jacobs 111 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1961
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 , as authority for setting aside his plea of guilty.
State Ex Rel. Norgaard v. Tahash 110 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1961
State Ex Rel. Norgaard v. Tahash 110 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1961
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 .
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Tahash 109 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1961
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Tahash 109 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1961
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 , the petitioner contends that the writ should be granted because he did not have the required intent essential to the offense of committing robbery in the first degree.
State v. Martineau 101 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1960
State v. Martineau 101 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1960
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. Flynn v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1959
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 , the appellant contends that the writ should be granted because he did not have the intent to' defraud or deprive others of property which is an essential element of the offense, it is clear from the statement of the defendant himself that he unlawfully appropriated the money to his own use.
State Ex Rel. Flynn v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 .
State v. Beltowski 98 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1959
State v. Beltowski 98 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1959
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 ; State v. Gress, 250 Minn. 337 , 84 N. W. (2d) 616 ; State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; and Mallory v. United States, 354 U. S. 449 , 77 S. Ct. 1356 , 1 L. ed. (2d) 1479.
State Ex Rel. Adams v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Adams v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1958
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 , wherein the defendant prior to sentence indicated that he did not know whether he was guilty of an intent to commit the act with which he was charged.