Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Penkert, 90 N.W.2d 193.
-
Daigle v. Twin City Ready Mix Concrete Co.
128 N.W.2d 148
Minn. 1964
Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 ; State, by Lord, v. Bradac, 257 Minn. 467 , 102 N. W. (2d) 34 ; Wozniak v. Luta, 258 Minn. 234 , 103 N. W. (2d) 870 ; Olson v. Penkert, 252 Minn. 334 , 90 N. W. (2d) 193 .
- Perry v. Thorpe Bros. 124 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1963
-
Perry v. Thorpe Bros.
124 N.W.2d 493
Minn. 1963
Co. 126 Minn. 409, 410 , , to the effect that “[w]hen a broker procures a purchaser, presents him to his principal, and the principal, without fraud or other wrong on the part of the broker, accepts him and enters into an enforceable contract with him, the broker’s compensation is earned.” They also cite Bailie v. Ridker, 249 Minn. 161 , 81 N. W. (2d) 798 , and Olson v. Penkert, 252 Minn. 334 , 90 N. W. (2d) 193 .
- Mester v. Fritze 121 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1963
-
Mester v. Fritze
121 N.W.2d 335
Minn. 1963
Rules 51, 59.01(7), and 61 of Rules of Civil Procedure; Olson v. Penkert, 252 Minn. 334 , 90 N. W. (2d) 193 ; Peterson v. Lang, 239 Minn. 319 , 58 N. W. (2d) 609 .
- Lehman v. Stout 112 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1961
-
Lehman v. Stout
112 N.W.2d 640
Minn. 1961
Restatement, Contracts, § 419, Illustration 2; Rye v. Phillips, 203 Minn. 567 , , 119 A. L. R. 1120; Brack v. Brack, 218 Minn. 503 , 16 N. W. (2d) 557 ; Olson v. Penkert, 252 Minn. 334 , 90 N. W. (2d) 193 .
- Bishop v. Norell 353 P.2d 1022 Ariz. 1960
- Besco v. Franken 101 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1960
-
Besco v. Franken
101 N.W.2d 431
Minn. 1960
Olson v. Penkert, 252 Minn. 334 , 90 N. W. (2d) 193 ; McDonough v. Newmans Cloak & Suit Co. 247 Minn. 250 , 77 N. W. (2d) 59 , 61 A. L. R. (2d) 100; Malmquist v. Leeds, 245 Minn. 130 , 71 N. W. (2d) 863 .