Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, 84 N.W.2d 282.

85 citing documents.

City of Saint Paul v. Northern States Power Co. 450 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, 250 Minn. 130, 135
Olsen v. Special School Dist. No. 1 427 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Olsen v. Special School Dist. No. 1 427 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, 250 Minn. 130, 137 , 84 N.W.
Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, 250 Minn. 130, 137 , see Minn.Stat.
Brezinka v. Bystrom Bros., Inc. 403 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1987
Brezinka v. Bystrom Bros., Inc. 403 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1987
Paul Metropolitan Airports Comm’n, 250 Minn. 130, 136
McClelland v. McClelland 393 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
McClelland v. McClelland 393 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, 250 Minn. 130, 136
County of Hennepin Ex Rel. Bartlow v. Brinkman 378 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1985
County of Hennepin Ex Rel. Bartlow v. Brinkman 378 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1985
Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, 250 Minn. 130, 136
Ridgewood Development Co. v. State 294 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1980
Ridgewood Development Co. v. State 294 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1980
Paul Metropolitan Airports Comm’n, 250 Minn. 130 , (retrospective legislation is constitutionally prohibited when it divests a private vested interest).
Byrd v. O'NEILL 244 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1976
Byrd v. O'NEILL 244 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1976
Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, 250 Minn. 130 , IB Dunnell, Dig.
State v. North Star Research & Development Institute 200 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1972
State v. North Star Research & Development Institute 200 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1972
Paul Metro Airports, 250 [Minn.] 130, .)
Tourville v. Tourville 198 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1972
Tourville v. Tourville 198 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1972
250 Minn. 130 , 1B Dunnell, Dig.
JOHN W. THOMAS COMPANY v. Carlson-LaVine, Inc. 189 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1971
JOHN W. THOMAS COMPANY v. Carlson-LaVine, Inc. 189 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1971
Co. 52 Minn. 352 , ; Bauman v. Metzger, 145 Minn. 133 , ; Skolnick v. *34 Gruesner, 196 Minn. 318 , ; Holen v. M. A. C. 250 Minn. 130 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282 ; Ketterer v. Independent School Dist.
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
We have reference to Erickson v. King, 218 Minn. 98 , 15 N. W. (2d) 201 , involving the provisions of a law creating the Metropolitan Airports Commission; Holen v. MAC, 250 Minn. 130 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282 ; Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth, 234 Minn. 221 , 48 N. W. (2d) 175 , being the first challenge in this state to the housing authority *288 law raised in this court; and Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635 , in which the laws creating and providing for
Fingerhut Manufacturing Co. v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 125 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1964
Fingerhut Manufacturing Co. v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 125 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1964
250 Minn. 130 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282 .
Schoening v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. 120 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1963
Schoening v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. 120 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1963
That a municipality may waive its immunity was established in Howard v. Village of Chisholm, 191 Minn. 245 , , and in Holen v. M. A. C. 250 Minn. 130, 138 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282, 288 , this court held it to be well settled that a legislature may cure, by retrospective act, irregularities in the exercise of power which it has conferred on a municipal corporation.
County of Big Stone v. Village of Appleton 112 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1961
County of Big Stone v. Village of Appleton 112 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1961
The governing rule is expressed in Holen v. M. A. C. 250 Minn. 130, 136 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282, 287 , as follows: “* * * When the legislature changes the law while a case is pending, but prior to the rendition of judgment, the court may not perpetuate the old law but must apply the new.
Winter v. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America 107 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1961
Winter v. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America 107 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1961
Co. v. Sprague, 140 Minn. 1 , ; Bauman v. Metzger, 145 Minn. 133 , ; Skolnick v. Gruesner, 196 Minn. 318 , ; Holen v. M. A. C. 250 Minn. 130 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282 .
Chun King Sales, Inc. v. County of St. Louis 98 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1959
Chun King Sales, Inc. v. County of St. Louis 98 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1959
t product; Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635 , relating to the constitutionality of certain acts providing for the financing of reclamation of land and construction of terminal port facilities; Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth, 234 Minn. 221 , 48 N. W. (2d) 175 , involving the validity of legislation providing for low-cost housing; and Holen v. M. A. C. 250 Minn. 130 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282 , involving an action to enjoin issuance of bonds to finance impro
Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 97 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1959
Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 97 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1959
250 Minn. 130 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282 , that where an amendatory statute, which is clearly intended to be retroactive and applicable to pending litigation involving public rights, is enacted after judgment and pending appeal, the appellate court must dispose of the case in accordance with the law as changed by such amendatory enactment

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by