Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Manion v. Tweedy, 100 N.W.2d 124.

76 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
This includes decisions related to “[t]he mode, manner, and method of receiving testimony.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“The mode, manner, and method of receiving testimony is a matter resting almost wholly in the discretion of the trial court and does not furnish grounds for a new trial unless some prejudice can be shown.”
State of Minnesota v. Jairo Missael Fernandez Sorto Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jairo Missael Fernandez Sorto Minn. Ct. App. 2024
611(a); ) (reviewing a district court’s courtroom-management decisions for an abuse of discretion), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Court of Appeals Hudson, J. Dissenting as to Part I, Anderson, J., David Smits, as Trustee for the … Minn. 2022
We decline to hold a therapist treating severe depression to a lower standard than, say, a hospitalist treating a severe viral infection, see Warren, d at 378, or a physician treating a complex leg fracture
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
Manion v. Tweedy , 257 Minn. 59 , , 129 (1959).
In Re Preston 629 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Preston 629 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 67-68
Koch v. Mork Clinic, P.A. 540 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Koch v. Mork Clinic, P.A. 540 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 64
Henkemeyer v. Boxall 465 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Henkemeyer v. Boxall 465 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 66
State v. Ross 451 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Ross 451 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
611(a); Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. *236 59, 67-68
McElwain v. Van Beek 447 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
McElwain v. Van Beek 447 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Medical malpractice is “the failure of a physician and surgeon to exercise the care and professional skill usually exercised by the ordinary member of his profession in good *445 standing in the same or similar locality.” Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 66
Omnetics, Inc. v. Radiant Technology Corp. 440 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Omnetics, Inc. v. Radiant Technology Corp. 440 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 64 , (quoting Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 202 , ).
Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. Subak 391 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1986
Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. Subak 391 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1986
264 (1907); Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59 , Silver v. Redleaf, 292 Minn. 463 , Todd v. Eitel Hospital, 306 Minn. 254
Kohoutek v. Hafner 383 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1986
Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. Subak 379 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. Subak 379 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Todd v. Eitel Hospital, 306 Minn. 254, 261 , -62 (1975) (footnote omitted); see also Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 70 , (test including “honest error” language followed consistently throughout Minnesota decisions).
Borka v. Emergency Physicians Professional Ass'n 379 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Borka v. Emergency Physicians Professional Ass'n 379 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
d at 875 , n. 16 (citing Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, ).
Kalsbeck v. Westview Clinic, P.A. 375 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kalsbeck v. Westview Clinic, P.A. 375 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
at 209 , d at 799 , Sandhofer at 367 , Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 64
Lane Ex Rel. Lane v. Skyline Family Medical Center 363 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lane Ex Rel. Lane v. Skyline Family Medical Center 363 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The duty to refer theory was first applied in a medical malpractice case in Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
See, Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59
Kinning Ex Rel. Kinning v. Nelson 281 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1979
Kinning Ex Rel. Kinning v. Nelson 281 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1979
ioners similarly situated in like communities different courses of procedures may properly and reasonably be applied, the doctor has a right to use his best judgment in the selection of equally available proper and reasonable procedures.” This addition was also an accurate statement of the law because it is an almost verbatim restatement of instructions approved by this court in Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 67
Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 274 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1979
Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 274 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1979
See also Busch v. Busch Const., Inc., Minn., Smith v. Kahler Corp., Inc., 297 Minn. 272, 282 , Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 64
Woodrow v. Tobler 269 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1978
Woodrow v. Tobler 269 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1978
Lauer v. Loecken, 295 Minn. 345, 347 , Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59
Weiby v. Wente 264 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1978
Weiby v. Wente 264 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1978
Lauer v. Loecken, 295 Minn. 345 , Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59
Cornfeldt v. Tongen 262 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1977
Cornfeldt v. Tongen 262 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1977
Lhotka v. Larson, 307 Minn. 121, 125, note 7 , Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 63
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
In Smith v. The Kahler Corp. Inc., 297 Minn. 272, 282 , citing Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , and Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59 , we stated: “ ‘ * * * [T]he charge of the trial court must be viewed in its entirety and from a practical and commonsense point of view.
Larsen v. Yelle 246 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1976
Larsen v. Yelle 246 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1976
See, Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 65
Lhotka v. Larson 238 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1976
Lhotka v. Larson 238 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1976
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59
City of Eveleth v. Ruble 225 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1974
City of Eveleth v. Ruble 225 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1974
For discussions of professional negligence in other fields, see, e.g., Gammel v. Ernst & Ernst, supra (accountants); Harris v. Wood, 214 Minn. 492 , (dentist); Swanson v. Chatterton, 281 Minn. 129 , Schulz v. Feigal, 273 Minn. 470 , Jensen v. Linner, 260 Minn. 22 , Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59 , Yates 7.