Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co., 95 N.W.2d 497.

27 citing documents.

DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Zitzow v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 568 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Zitzow v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 568 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., 255 Minn. 19, 25-26
Dosdall v. Smith 415 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dosdall v. Smith 415 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co., 255 Minn. 19, 24 , rev’d on other grounds
Balder v. Haley 390 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Balder v. Haley 390 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co., 255 Minn. 19, 24
Parks v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. 289 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1979
Parks v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. 289 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1979
Co., 255 Minn. 19 , Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co., supra ; Restatement of Torts 2d § 394; JIG 405 G-S.
Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 258 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1977
Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 258 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1977
v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co., 248 Minn. 319, 325 , : “ * * * If the manufacturer undertakes by printed instructions to advise of the proper use to be made of a chattel, he assumes the responsibility of giving accurate and adequate instructions with respect to the dangers inherent in its use in some other manner.” See, Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co., 255 Minn. 19 , Hartmon v. National Heater Co., 240 Minn. 264
Clark v. RENTAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 220 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1974
Clark v. RENTAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 220 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1974
Co. 255 Minn. 19 , Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Imp.
Bossons v. the Hertz Corporation 176 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1970
Stahlberg v. Moe 166 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1969
Stahlberg v. Moe 166 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1969
Co. 255 Minn. 19, 25, note 3 , 95 *83 N. W. (2d) 497, 502, note 3, this court has stated the requirements for the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur as follows: “* * * (1) Plaintiff must have been injured by an apparátus or instrumentality whose nature is such that injury is not ordinarily to be expected in the absence o
Okrina v. Midwestern Corporation 165 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1969
Okrina v. Midwestern Corporation 165 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1969
Co. 255 Minn. 19 , 95 N. W. (2d) 497 ; and Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , 144 N. W. (2d) 580 .
McCormack v. Hankscraft Company 154 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1967
McCormack v. Hankscraft Company 154 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1967
Co. 255 Minn. 19 , 95 N. W. (2d) 497 ; Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Imp.
Bates v. ROOT-LOWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY 149 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1967
Bates v. ROOT-LOWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY 149 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1967
Co. 255 Minn. 19 , 95 N. W. (2d) 497 ; Hacker v. Berkner, 263 Minn. 278 , 117 N. W. (2d) 13 ; Peterson v. Modjeski, 263 Minn. 413 , 117 N. W. (2d) 237 ; Gardner v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. 267 Minn. 505 , 127 N. W. (2d) 557 ; Sarsfield v. St.
Westerberg v. School District No. 792, Todd County 148 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1967
Westerberg v. School District No. 792, Todd County 148 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1967
Co. 255 Minn. 19 , 95 N. W. (2d) 497 .
Miller v. MacAlester College 115 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1962
Miller v. MacAlester College 115 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1962
Co. 255 Minn. 19 , 95 N. W. (2d) 497 ; Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 248 Minn. 319 , 79 N. W. (2d) 688 ; Hartmon v. National Heater Co. 240 Minn. 264 , 60 N. W. (2d) 804 .