DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Visina v. Freeman, 89 N.W.2d 635.

70 citing documents.

  • PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF SAINT PAUL v. Fisher 145 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1966
  • PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF SAINT PAUL v. Fisher 145 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1966
    We need not repeat the broad general principles stated in Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635 , and our prior opinion in this case, which must govern our decision.
  • In Re Taxes for 1961 on Real Estate Owned by Cold Spring Granite Co. 136 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1965
  • In Re Taxes for 1961 on Real Estate Owned by Cold Spring Granite Co. 136 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1965
    In Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635 , an attack was made on the constitutionality of acts pertaining to the Port Authority of Duluth.
  • Borgelt v. City of Minneapolis 135 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1965
  • Borgelt v. City of Minneapolis 135 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1965
    In Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635 , we discussed the question of what is a public purpose.
  • PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
  • PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
    o Erickson v. King, 218 Minn. 98 , 15 N. W. (2d) 201 , involving the provisions of a law creating the Metropolitan Airports Commission; Holen v. MAC, 250 Minn. 130 , 84 N. W. (2d) 282 ; Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth, 234 Minn. 221 , 48 N. W. (2d) 175 , being the first challenge in this state to the housing authority *288 law raised in this court; and Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635 , in which the laws creating and providing for the financing of th
  • Chun King Sales, Inc. v. County of St. Louis 98 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1959
  • Chun King Sales, Inc. v. County of St. Louis 98 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1959
    e tax on apples, the proceeds to be used for the exclusive purpose of advertising and promoting the sale of that commodity; State v. Vahlsing, Inc. 147 Me. 417 , 88 A. (2d) 144, involving an excise tax levied on potatoes produced in the state, the proceeds of which were to be devoted to investigation of better methods for production, shipment, and merchandising of that product; Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635 , relating to the constitutionality of certain acts providing for
  • HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. Greenman 96 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1959
  • HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. Greenman 96 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1959
    In Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177, 184 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635, 643 , we observed: “* * * What is a ‘public purpose’ that will justify the expenditure of public money is not capable of a precise definition, but the courts generally construe it to mean such an activity as will serve as a benefit *404 to the community as a body and which, at the same time
  • State Ex Rel. Brown v. Johnson 96 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1959
  • State Ex Rel. Brown v. Johnson 96 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1959
    3 Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177, 199 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635, 653 ; see, Minn. Const, art. 3, § 1.
  • John Wright & Associates, Inc. v. City of Red Wing 93 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1958
  • John Wright & Associates, Inc. v. City of Red Wing 93 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1958
    Discussing an issue with reference to expenditures for a “public purpose,” we said in Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177, 184 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635 , 643: “* * * what is a ‘public purpose’ that will justify the expenditure of public money is not capable of a precise definition, but the courts generally construe it to mean such an activity as will serve as a benefit to the community as a body and which, at the same time, is directly relate
  • Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman 91 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1958
  • Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman 91 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1958
    In Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177, 184 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635, 643 , we said: “* * * What is a ‘public purpose’ that will justify the expenditure of public money is not capable of a precise definition, but the courts generally construe it to mean such an activity as will serve as a benefit to the community as a body and which, at the same time, is direct
  • Naftalin v. King 90 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1958
  • Naftalin v. King 90 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1958
    Recently in Visina v. Freeman, 252 Minn. 177 , 89 N. W. (2d) 635 , we recognized that the foregoing decisions were controlling and held, as well established, that this type of financing does not contravene the constitutional limitation upon the contraction of state debt.