Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Estate of Karger, 253 Minn. 542.

21 citing documents.

Jeremy McNitt, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Minnesota IT Services (MNIT), Appellant/Cross-Respondent Minn. 2026
(“What the law ought to be is for the legislature; what the law is, rests with the courts.”).
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Morgan Holl Minn. 2021
Safety, ( (“What the law ought to be is for the legislature.
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
(“What the law ought to be is for the legislature; what the law is, rests with the courts.”).
State v. Carson 902 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 2017
State v. Carson 902 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 2017
Safety, (citing In re Estate of Karger, 253 Minn. 542 , (“What the law ought to be is for the [Legislature.”)), superseded by statute, Minn. Stat. 169A.53, subd.
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson 889 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson 889 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
See In re Estate of Karger, 253 Minn. 542, 548, (“What the law ought to be is for the legislature; what the law is, rests with the courts.”).
State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan Ali 855 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2014
Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 848 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2014
Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 848 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2014
See In re Estate of Karger, 253 Minn. 542, 548 , (“What the law ought to be is for the legislature; what the law is, rests with the courts.”); see also Minn.Stat.
Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp. 644 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 2002
Weber Ex Rel. Weber v. Anderson 269 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1978
Weber Ex Rel. Weber v. Anderson 269 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1978
In re Estate of Karger, 253 Minn. 542
Gollner v. Champagne 260 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1977
Gollner v. Champagne 260 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1977
284 (1936); In re Estate of Karger, 253 Minn. 542
Hietala v. Heir of Pakarinen 178 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1970
Hietala v. Heir of Pakarinen 178 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1970
ne, have decried the legislative failure to enact statutes mitigating the harshness of the common-law rule which regarded a child born out of wedlock as “the child of nobody” or “the child of the people” in his social and economic relationships and “barbarically handicapped and burdened children of illegitimate parents for sins in the commission of which they had no part.” In re Estate of Karger, 253 Minn. 542, 548 , 93 N. W. (2d) 137, 142 ; Jung v. St.
In Re Brennan 134 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1965
Sadden v. Lutheran Welfare Service 134 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1965
Sadden v. Lutheran Welfare Service 134 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1965
In re Estate of Karger, 253 Minn. 542 , 93 N. W. (2d) 137 .
In Re Brennan 134 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1965
In re Estate of Karger, 253 Minn. 542 , .