Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Pahl, 95 N.W.2d 85.

28 citing documents.

Minn. 2020
This rule measures “the difference between the market value of the entire tract immediately before the taking and the market value of what is left after the taking.” State by Lord v. Pahl
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, Minn. 2020
That is, the damages are measured by “the difference between the market value of the entire tract immediately before the taking and the market value of what is left after the taking.”
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Strom 493 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1992
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Strom 493 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1992
See also State v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349, 356
State Ex Rel. Humprey v. Briggs 488 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State Ex Rel. Humprey v. Briggs 488 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Evidence of value for uses prohibited by an ordinance is admissible “only where there is evidence showing a reasonable probability *815 that the ordinance will be changed in the near future.” State v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349, 356
Special Assessment Appeals of County of Ramsey v. Town of White Bear 469 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Special Assessment Appeals of County of Ramsey v. Town of White Bear 469 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Paul v. Rein Recreation, Inc., State v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349, 356
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
While an owner of property subject to condemnation has a duty to exercise reasonable diligence to mitigate damages, State v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349, 357 , NWA has not yet applied for an entrance permit from any government agency to construct the entrance.
City of New Ulm v. Schultz 356 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
City of New Ulm v. Schultz 356 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See State by Lord v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349, 356
Alexandria Lake Area Service Region v. Johnson 295 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 1980
Alexandria Lake Area Service Region v. Johnson 295 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 1980
State, by Lord, v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349
County of Ramsey v. Stevens 283 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1979
County of Ramsey v. Stevens 283 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1979
State, by Lord v. Pahl, 264 Minn. 349
Hedberg & Sons Co. v. County of Hennepin 232 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1975
Hedberg & Sons Co. v. County of Hennepin 232 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1975
This court’s opinion in State, by Lord, v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349, 356 , contains the following language which is relevant here: “Existing valid zoning ordinances may prescribe or limit those uses which may be considered in proving market value.
State v. Casey 115 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 1962
State v. Hayden Miller Co. 116 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1962
State v. Casey 115 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 1962
State, by Lord, v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349 , 95 N. W. (2d) 85 , and authorities cited; see, 1 Bonbright, Valuation of Property, p. 422; 42 Minn. L. Rev. 106 , 118.
State v. Hayden Miller Co. 116 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1962
897 ; State, by Lord, v. Frisby, 260 Minn. 70 , 108 N. W. (2d) 769 ; State, by Lord, v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349 , 95 N. W. (2d) 85 ; State, by Benson, v. Horman, 188 Minn. 252 , .
Olsen v. City of Minneapolis 115 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1962
Olsen v. City of Minneapolis 115 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1962
Foster v. City of Minneapolis, 255 Minn. 249 , 97 N. W. (2d) 273 ; State, by Lord, v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349 , 95 N. W. (2d) 85 ; Binder v. Village of Golden Valley, 260 Minn. 418 , 110 N. W. (2d) 306 ; Phipps v. City of Chicago, 339 Ill.
Binder v. Village of Golden Valley 110 N.W.2d 306 Minn. 1961
Binder v. Village of Golden Valley 110 N.W.2d 306 Minn. 1961
2 State, by Lord, v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349 , 95 N. W. (2d) 85 ; State, by Peterson, v. Anderson, 220 Minn. 139 , 19 N. W. (2d) 70 ; Burnquist v. Cook, 220 Minn. 48 , 19 N. W. (2d) 394 ; see, also, Connor v. Township of Chanhassen, 249 Minn. 205 , 81 N. W. (2d) 789 (as to continuance of nonconforming use).
State, by Lord v. Frisby 108 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1961
State, by Lord v. Frisby 108 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1961
6 Some of the authorities on the measure of damages are gathered in State, by Lord, v. Pahl, 254 Minn. 349 , 95 N. W. (2d) 85 .