Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wilson v. Sorge, 97 N.W.2d 477.

58 citing documents.

Followed Capriotti v. Beck 117 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1962
Since Wilson v. Sorge, 256 Minn. 125, 132 , 97 N. W. (2d) 477, 483 , we adhere to the rule that impairment of future earning capacity is an item of general damages.
Hall v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. 106 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1960
Hall v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. 106 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1960
We have recently said in Wilson v. Sorge, 256 Minn. 125 , 97 N. W. (2d) 477 , that granting a new trial for misconduct of counsel in closing argument rests almost wholly in the discretion of the trial court, which is in a better position to assess its impact on the jury.
Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel 104 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1960
Klingbeil v. Truesdell 98 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1959
Klingbeil v. Truesdell 98 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1959
The apparent difficulties encountered in proving diminution of earning capacity have now been largely solved by our decision in Wilson v. Sorge, 256 Minn. 125, 132 , 97 N. W. (2d) 477, 483 , where we noted that impairment of earning capacity is an item of general damages.
Zaikaner v. Small 98 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1959
Zaikaner v. Small 98 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1959
Since the decision in the Person case was handed down, this court has reconsidered the issue in Wilson v. Sorge, 256 Minn. 125 , 97 N. W. (2d) 477 , in which it held as follows: “Loss or impairment of future earning capacity is an item of general damages.