Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Seifert, 100 N.W.2d 689.

32 citing documents.

Ryan Carlson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In Minnesota, a riparian owner has the “right to make such use of the [waterway] over its entire surface, in common with all other abutting owners.”
Ryan Carlson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Steven Schussler, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
ks as shown on the annexed plat are hereby dedicated to the public for the uses contemplated therein.” It identified a fire la ne as one such dedica tion along the southern 4 In Minnesota, a riparian owner has the “right to make such use of the [waterway] over its entire surface, in co mmon with all other abutting owners.” Johnson v. Seifert
In the Matter of the Application of Chris Bolton for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Johnson v. Seifert , –97 (Minn. 1960).
Magnuson v. Cossette 707 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Magnuson v. Cossette 707 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159, 168-69 , -97 (1960).
Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural Resources 704 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural Resources 704 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159, 168-69 , -97 (1960).
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 693 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 693 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
In Johnson v. Seifert, we held that an owner of lakefront property may use the abutting lake for recreational purposes, “provided such use is reasonable[.]” 257 Minn. 159, 168-69 , -97 (1960).
State v. Wagner 555 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Wagner 555 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
However, the supreme court expressly overruled Lamprey in Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159, 168
McLafferty v. St. Aubin 500 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
McLafferty v. St. Aubin 500 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159, 169
Central Baptist Theological Seminary v. City of New Brighton 487 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Central Baptist Theological Seminary v. City of New Brighton 487 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Because “existing rights” refers to “riparian rights,” and because riparian rights are the rights to use and enjoy water, see Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159, 164 , this court’s analysis in Central Baptist I concluded: Building a radio tower is not a riparian right * * * The Commissioner did not err by concluding the seminary had no existing right to build a radio tower.
Corazalla v. Quie 473 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Corazalla v. Quie 473 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bartlett v. Stalker Lake Sportsmen’s Club, 283 Minn. 393, 399 , Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159, 167 , -96 (1960).
Application of Christenson 417 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1987
Application of Christenson 417 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1987
Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159, 166
Lake Mille Lacs Investment, Inc. v. Payne 401 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lake Mille Lacs Investment, Inc. v. Payne 401 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The supreme court in Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159, 169 , -97 (1960), held that an owner of land abutting on a lake “suitable for fishing, boating” and other common uses, has riparian rights regardless of the navigable or public character of the lake and regardless of the ownership of the bed thereof.
In Re the Central Baptist Theological Seminary 370 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Central Baptist Theological Seminary 370 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159, 164 , Pratt, d at 772 .
Chabot v. Paradise 272 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1978
Slayton Gun Club v. Town of Shetek, Murray County 176 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1970
Slayton Gun Club v. Town of Shetek, Murray County 176 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1970
(See Johnson vs. Seifert, 1960, 257 Minn. 159 , 100 NW 2d 689 , and cases cited therein.)” Minn. St.
American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Logan 176 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1970
Bartlett v. Stalker Lake Sportsmen's Club 168 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1969
Bartlett v. Stalker Lake Sportsmen's Club 168 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1969
The Flynn case applied the rights of a riparian owner, as set out in Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159 , 100 N. W. (2d) 689 , to the public by virtue of its ownership of the easement abutting the lake.
Flynn v. Beisel 102 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1960
Flynn v. Beisel 102 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1960
Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159 , 100 N. W. (2d) 689 , and cases cited.