DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co., 100 N.W.2d 96.

28 citing documents.

  • Tuomela v. Reserve Mining Company 216 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1974
  • Tuomela v. Reserve Mining Company 216 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1974
    Joseph, 290 Minn. 565 , Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , Luthens v. Glencoe Red & White Store, 264 Minn. 26
  • Anderson v. Jensen 184 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1971
  • Anderson v. Jensen 184 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1971
    Fisher v. Red & White Taxi Co. 270 Minn. 317 , 133 N. W. (2d) 543 ; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 .
  • MacNamara v. Boyd Trust 177 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1970
  • MacNamara v. Boyd Trust 177 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1970
    Torrey v. Midland Cooperatives, Inc. 253 Minn. 489 , 93 N. W. (2d) 135 ; Schwerzler v. Frankamp, 255 Minn. 95 , 95 N. W. (2d) 503 ; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 ; Fogarty v. Martin Hotel Co. 257 Minn. 398 , 101 N. W. (2d) 601 ; Bennett v. Bartlett, 258 Minn. 159 , 103 N. W. (2d) 194 ; Nehring v. Bast, 258 Minn. 193 , 103 N. W. (2d) 368 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 ; Roberts v. Motor Cargo, Inc. 258 Min
  • Grabowski v. Great Northern Oil Company 167 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1969
  • Grabowski v. Great Northern Oil Company 167 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1969
    Luthens v. Glencoe Red & White Store, 264 Minn. 26 , 117 N. W. (2d) 386 ; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 ; Saari v. Dunwoody Iron Min.
  • Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1969
  • Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1969
    The Industrial Commission is not bound by the opinion of a neutral physician any more than it is bound by the opinion of any other doctor, Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 ; and while there are cases where a neutral physician might be highly desirable, we doubt that this is one of them.
  • Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 153 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1967
  • Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 153 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1967
    1 See, Reese v. Preston Marketing Assn. 274 Minn. 150 , 142 N. W. (2d) 721 ; Petter v. K. W. McKee, Inc. 270 Minn. 362 , 133 N. W. (2d) 638 ; Roberts v. Motor Cargo, Inc. 258 Minn. 425 , 104 N. W. (2d) 546 ; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 ; Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266 ; Lee v. Minneapolis St.
  • Reese v. Preston Marketing Association 142 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1966
  • Reese v. Preston Marketing Association 142 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1966
    4 Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214, 219 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266, 269 ; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108, 112 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96, 99 .
  • Hosking v. METROPOLITAN HOUSE MOVERS CORPORATION 138 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1965
  • Hosking v. METROPOLITAN HOUSE MOVERS CORPORATION 138 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1965
    Richter v. Shoppe P. & H. Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 ; Kruchowski v. Swift & Co. 201 Minn. 557 , ; Niess v. Superior Packing Co. 249 Minn. 263 , 81 N. W. (2d) 773 .
  • Martin v. Swift & Company 130 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1964
  • Martin v. Swift & Company 130 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1964
    1 See, Jacobson v. Uptown Transfer & Storage Co. 268 Minn. 336 , 129 *220 N. W. (2d) 41; Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393, 406 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22, 31 ; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108, 112 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96, 99 ; Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214, 219 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266, 269 ; Lee v. Minneapolis St.
  • Meyer v. AB McMahan Company 130 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1964
  • Meyer v. AB McMahan Company 130 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1964
    Jurich v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. 233 Minn. 108 , 46 N. W. (2d) 237 ; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 ; Ulve v. Bemidji Cooperative Creamery Assn. 267 Minn. 412 , 127 N. W. (2d) 147 .
  • Ulve v. BEMIDJI COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN. 127 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 1964
  • Ulve v. BEMIDJI COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN. 127 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 1964
    Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 .
  • Lahti v. M. A. Hanna Co. 120 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1963
  • Lahti v. M. A. Hanna Co. 120 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1963
    See, Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 .
  • Luthens v. Glencoe Red & White Store 117 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1962
  • Luthens v. Glencoe Red & White Store 117 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1962
    As stated in Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108, 112 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 , 98: “We must review the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain findings of the commission in the light of the well-established rule that the findings will not be disturbed unless manifestly contrary to the evidence or unless a consideration of all of the evidence and the inferences permissib
  • Roberts v. Motor Cargo, Inc. 104 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1960
  • Roberts v. Motor Cargo, Inc. 104 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1960
    See, 2 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 57.61, and cases cited under note 89; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96 .