Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 104 N.W.2d 301.

229 citing documents.

ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF EVIDENCE. Minn. 2016
ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF EVIDENCE. Minn. 2016
Schwartz v. Minneapolis Gas Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328, 104 N W2d 301, 303 (1960); Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas Co., 291 Minn. 334, 343, 191 NW2d 418, 424 (1971); Uinn.R.Oim.P.
State of Minnesota v. David Mendoza Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Mendoza Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328
State of Minnesota v. Alfonzo Benjamin Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alfonzo Benjamin Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
20(6), and Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325
Harry Jerome Evans v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 2015
Harry Jerome Evans v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 2015
at 864; see Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325
State of Minnesota v. David Lester McHan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lester McHan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328, (setting forth procedures for hearings on alleged juror misconduct).
Nissalke v. State 861 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 2015
Nissalke v. State 861 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 2015
20(6); Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328 , (providing procedures for post-verdict hearings on alleged juror misconduct).
Gary Cyril Jenco v. Paul James Crowe, M.D., John Y. Hendricks, M.D., North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gary Cyril Jenco v. Paul James Crowe, M.D., John Y. Hendricks, M.D., North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328
State of Minnesota v. Antawon Antonio Baker Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Antawon Antonio Baker Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328, (stating the procedure for questioning jurors following a verdict to determine whether jury misconduct occurred).
Evans v. State 788 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2010
Evans v. State 788 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2010
See Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325
Barry v. St. Anthony-New Brighton Independent School District 282 781 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Barry v. St. Anthony-New Brighton Independent School District 282 781 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328
Holt v. State 772 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
Holt v. State 772 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
See Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328
State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008
State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008
But, Evans contends, Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325 , prohibits an attorney from contacting and questioning a juror after a verdict has been rendered.
State v. Everson 749 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2008
State v. Everson 749 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2008
In Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325 , we crafted a procedure for inquiring into jury conduct that may have prevented a fair trial.
State v. Hanke 712 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Hanke 712 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
See Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328
State v. Morton 701 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2005
State v. Morton 701 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2005
Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328 , Minn. R.Crim.
Opsahl v. State 677 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
State v. Greer 662 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 2003
State v. Greer 662 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 2003
Doppler v. State 660 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 2003
Doppler v. State 660 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 2003
See Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325
State v. Powers 654 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 2003
State v. Powers 654 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 2003
Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325 , is the case that lends its name to hearings into improper influences on jurors in Minnesota.
Boitnott v. State 640 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2002
Boitnott v. State 640 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2002
Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325
Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325
State v. Martin 614 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 2000
State v. Martin 614 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 2000
See generally Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328
Pajunen v. Monson Trucking, Inc. 612 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Pajunen v. Monson Trucking, Inc. 612 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328
State v. Shoen 598 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1999
State v. Shoen 598 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1999
See Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 258 Minn. 325, 328
Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
Baker v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger 588 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1999