Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Knopp v. Gutterman, 102 N.W.2d 689.
- McCaleb v. Jackson 239 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1976
- Brochu v. United States Steel Corp. 237 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1976
-
Brochu v. United States Steel Corp.
237 N.W.2d 833
Minn. 1976
Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33 , Cowell v. Minnegas Co. 286 Minn. 535
-
McCaleb v. Jackson
239 N.W.2d 187
Minn. 1976
645.16; Graber v. Peter Lametti Const. Co. 293 Minn. 24 , Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33 , 17B Dunnell, Dig.
- State v. North Star Research & Development Institute 200 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1972
-
State v. North Star Research & Development Institute
200 N.W.2d 410
Minn. 1972
See, Graber v. Peter Lametti Const. Co. 293 Minn. 24 , Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33
- Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction Company 197 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1972
-
Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction Company
197 N.W.2d 443
Minn. 1972
Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33
- Ingebritson v. TJERNLUND MANUFACTURING COMPANY 183 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1971
-
Ingebritson v. TJERNLUND MANUFACTURING COMPANY
183 N.W.2d 552
Minn. 1971
A reasonable departmental practice in the administration of the statute is normally accorded substantial consideration, Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33 , 102 N. W. (2d) 689 , but even a longstanding administrative practice 8 is not binding if it is erroneous or contrary to the plain meaning of a statute.
- Cowell v. MINNEGAS COMPANY 176 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1970
-
Cowell v. MINNEGAS COMPANY
176 N.W.2d 84
Minn. 1970
Accordingly, on the authority of Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33 , 102 N. W. (2d) 689 , a “proceeding” had been commenced within the time specified by Minn. St.
- Christensen v. State, Department of Conservation, Game & Fish 175 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1970
-
Christensen v. State, Department of Conservation, Game & Fish
175 N.W.2d 433
Minn. 1970
Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33 , 102 N. W. (2d) 689 , presented the question whether the statute of limitations, Minn. St.
- Meinen v. Dashow 167 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1969
-
Meinen v. Dashow
167 N.W.2d 730
Minn. 1969
In our opinion, affirmance is required by our holding in Nyberg v. Little Falls Black Granite Co. 192 Minn. 404 , , recently relied on in Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33 , 102 N. W. (2d) 689 .
- Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed District 153 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1967
-
Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed District
153 N.W.2d 209
Minn. 1967
19 See, Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33 , 102 N. W. (2d) 689 .
- Stoecker v. Moeglein 129 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1964
-
Stoecker v. Moeglein
129 N.W.2d 793
Minn. 1964
2 Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33, 41 , 102 N. W., (2d) 689, 695.