Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eisel v. Eisel, 110 N.W.2d 881.

41 citing documents.

  • In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
  • In re the Marriage of: Samuel H. Boimah, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    The district court’s statement on this point follows caselaw: “While obviously parents have real and substantial rights in rearing and educating their children, it is axiomatic that such rights are subordinate to the welfare of the child where there is a conflict.”
  • Marriage of Crowley v. Meyer 897 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 2017
  • Marriage of Crowley v. Meyer 897 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 2017
    As we said in Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , “[e]xcept in the most extraordinary cases, the practice of requiring repeated hearings and leaving the question of permanent custody undecided for an extended period of time is inadvisable and unnecessary.” CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the decision of the court of appe
  • Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield 452 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
  • High v. High 210 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1973
  • High v. High 210 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1973
    This they cannot do without having their legal relationship with their children fixed with something approaching finality.” Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1, 5
  • State Ex Rel. Fisher v. Devins 200 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1972
  • State Ex Rel. Fisher v. Devins 200 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1972
    In Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1, 6 , we said: “In determining the question of custody, the trial courts are vested with broad discretion, and appeal courts are reluctant to interfere with their determination.
  • Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
  • Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
    Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 ; Currier v. Currier, 271 Minn. 369 , 136 N. W. (2d) 55 ; Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , 170 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , 159 N. W. (2d) 271 ; Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 .
  • Reiland v. Reiland 185 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1971
  • Reiland v. Reiland 185 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1971
    Johnson v. Johnson, 223 Minn. 420 , 27 N. W. (2d) 289 ; Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , 163 N. W. (2d) 870 ; Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , 170 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Borchert v. Borchert, 279 Minn. 16 , 154 N. W. (2d) 902 ; Lobash v. Lobash, 283 Minn. 255 , 167 N. W. (2d) 43 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 .
  • Hanson v. Hanson 170 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1969
  • Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
  • Hanson v. Hanson 170 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1969
    Defendant cites as controlling Reiland v. Reiland, 280 Minn. 444 , 160 N. W. (2d) 30 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; and French v. French, 236 Minn. *329 439, 53 N. W. (2d) 215 .
  • Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
    Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Bennett v. Bennett, 277 Minn. 227, 229 , 152 N. W. (2d) 187, 189 ; Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , 163 N. W. (2d) 870 .
  • Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
  • Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
    Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 .
  • Lobash v. Lobash 167 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1969
  • Lobash v. Lobash 167 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1969
    Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 ; Reiland v. Reiland, 280 Minn. 444, 448 , 160 N. W. (2d) 30, 32 , which cites with approval Wendland v. Wendland, 29 Wis.
  • Lindberg v. Lindberg 163 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1969
  • Lindberg v. Lindberg 163 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1969
    Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 223 Minn. 420 , 27 N. W. (2d) 289 ; Larson v. Larson, 176 Minn. 490 , .
  • Reiland v. Reiland 160 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1968
  • Reiland v. Reiland 160 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1968
    Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Wendland v. Wendland, 29 Wis.
  • Fish v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1968
  • Fish v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1968
    In Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 , a child who was 8 at the time of appeal had been in his father’s custody for 4 years.
  • Bennett v. Bennett 152 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1967
  • Bennett v. Bennett 152 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1967
    In support of her contention that the best interests and the welfare of the child would be served by placing her with the mother, defendant relies on Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 , and Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 .
  • In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
  • State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
  • In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
    2d 448, 453 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1, 5 , .
  • State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
    Lehman v. Martin, 95 Minn. 121 , ; In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , 97 N. W. (2d) 425 ; In re Adoption of Kure, 197 Minn. 234, 236 , ; In re Baby Girl Larson, 252 Minn. 490, 496 , 91 N. W. (2d) 448, 453 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1, 5 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881, 884 .
  • Schultz v. Schultz 123 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1963
  • Schultz v. Schultz 123 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1963
    Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 .
  • Zaine v. Zaine 120 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1963
  • Zaine v. Zaine 120 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1963
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , 80 N. W. (2d) 13 ; Atwood v. Atwood, 253 Minn. 185 , 91 N. W. (2d) 728 ; Wicklem v. Wicklem, 229 Minn. 478 , 40 N. W. (2d) 69 ; Mund v. Mund, 252 Minn. 442 , 90 N. W. (2d) 309 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 .
  • Gumphrey v. Gumphrey 115 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1962
  • Gumphrey v. Gumphrey 115 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1962
    See, Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 .
  • Meinhardt v. Meinhardt 111 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1961
  • Meinhardt v. Meinhardt 111 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1961
    Many of the cases on this subject have recently been reviewed in the case of Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 .