Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eisel v. Eisel, 110 N.W.2d 881.
- In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
In re the Marriage of: Samuel H. Boimah, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The district court’s statement on this point follows caselaw: “While obviously parents have real and substantial rights in rearing and educating their children, it is axiomatic that such rights are subordinate to the welfare of the child where there is a conflict.”
- Marriage of Crowley v. Meyer 897 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 2017
-
Marriage of Crowley v. Meyer
897 N.W.2d 288
Minn. 2017
As we said in Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , “[e]xcept in the most extraordinary cases, the practice of requiring repeated hearings and leaving the question of permanent custody undecided for an extended period of time is inadvisable and unnecessary.” CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the decision of the court of appe
- Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield 452 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
- High v. High 210 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1973
-
High v. High
210 N.W.2d 309
Minn. 1973
This they cannot do without having their legal relationship with their children fixed with something approaching finality.” Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1, 5
- State Ex Rel. Fisher v. Devins 200 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1972
-
State Ex Rel. Fisher v. Devins
200 N.W.2d 28
Minn. 1972
In Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1, 6 , we said: “In determining the question of custody, the trial courts are vested with broad discretion, and appeal courts are reluctant to interfere with their determination.
- Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
-
Wallin v. Wallin
187 N.W.2d 627
Minn. 1971
Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 ; Currier v. Currier, 271 Minn. 369 , 136 N. W. (2d) 55 ; Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , 170 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , 159 N. W. (2d) 271 ; Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 .
- Reiland v. Reiland 185 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1971
-
Reiland v. Reiland
185 N.W.2d 879
Minn. 1971
Johnson v. Johnson, 223 Minn. 420 , 27 N. W. (2d) 289 ; Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , 163 N. W. (2d) 870 ; Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , 170 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Borchert v. Borchert, 279 Minn. 16 , 154 N. W. (2d) 902 ; Lobash v. Lobash, 283 Minn. 255 , 167 N. W. (2d) 43 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 .
- Hanson v. Hanson 170 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1969
- Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
-
Hanson v. Hanson
170 N.W.2d 213
Minn. 1969
Defendant cites as controlling Reiland v. Reiland, 280 Minn. 444 , 160 N. W. (2d) 30 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; and French v. French, 236 Minn. *329 439, 53 N. W. (2d) 215 .
-
Vandewege v. Vandewege
170 N.W.2d 228
Minn. 1969
Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Bennett v. Bennett, 277 Minn. 227, 229 , 152 N. W. (2d) 187, 189 ; Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , 163 N. W. (2d) 870 .
- Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
-
Hansen v. Hansen
169 N.W.2d 12
Minn. 1969
Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 .
- Lobash v. Lobash 167 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1969
-
Lobash v. Lobash
167 N.W.2d 43
Minn. 1969
Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 ; Reiland v. Reiland, 280 Minn. 444, 448 , 160 N. W. (2d) 30, 32 , which cites with approval Wendland v. Wendland, 29 Wis.
- Lindberg v. Lindberg 163 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1969
-
Lindberg v. Lindberg
163 N.W.2d 870
Minn. 1969
Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 223 Minn. 420 , 27 N. W. (2d) 289 ; Larson v. Larson, 176 Minn. 490 , .
- Reiland v. Reiland 160 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1968
-
Reiland v. Reiland
160 N.W.2d 30
Minn. 1968
Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Wendland v. Wendland, 29 Wis.
- Fish v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1968
-
Fish v. Fish
159 N.W.2d 271
Minn. 1968
In Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 , a child who was 8 at the time of appeal had been in his father’s custody for 4 years.
- Bennett v. Bennett 152 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1967
-
Bennett v. Bennett
152 N.W.2d 187
Minn. 1967
In support of her contention that the best interests and the welfare of the child would be served by placing her with the mother, defendant relies on Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 , and Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 .
- In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
- State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
-
In Re Alsdurf's Petition
133 N.W.2d 479
Minn. 1965
2d 448, 453 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1, 5 , .
-
State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf
133 N.W.2d 479
Minn. 1965
Lehman v. Martin, 95 Minn. 121 , ; In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , 97 N. W. (2d) 425 ; In re Adoption of Kure, 197 Minn. 234, 236 , ; In re Baby Girl Larson, 252 Minn. 490, 496 , 91 N. W. (2d) 448, 453 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1, 5 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881, 884 .
- Schultz v. Schultz 123 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1963
-
Schultz v. Schultz
123 N.W.2d 118
Minn. 1963
Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 .
- Zaine v. Zaine 120 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1963
-
Zaine v. Zaine
120 N.W.2d 324
Minn. 1963
Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , 80 N. W. (2d) 13 ; Atwood v. Atwood, 253 Minn. 185 , 91 N. W. (2d) 728 ; Wicklem v. Wicklem, 229 Minn. 478 , 40 N. W. (2d) 69 ; Mund v. Mund, 252 Minn. 442 , 90 N. W. (2d) 309 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 .
- Gumphrey v. Gumphrey 115 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1962
-
Gumphrey v. Gumphrey
115 N.W.2d 353
Minn. 1962
See, Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 .
- Meinhardt v. Meinhardt 111 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1961
-
Meinhardt v. Meinhardt
111 N.W.2d 782
Minn. 1961
Many of the cases on this subject have recently been reviewed in the case of Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 .