DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Harding, 110 N.W.2d 463.

25 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    6 corrected or contradicted during the colloquy); see also, d 785, 794 (Minn. 1966) (affirming denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea where the record did not support the defendant’s claim of innocence); d 463, 468-69 (Minn. 1961) (affirming denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea where “[a] careful reading of the entire transcript indicates nothing upon which defendant might base support for his claim of innocence ”); rev. denied (Minn. July 31, 1986) (affirmin
  • State v. Robinson 388 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Robinson 388 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464, 473
  • State v. Bryant 378 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Bryant 378 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464, 473 , (trial court exercised reasonable discretion in denying motion for a change of plea where nothing in the record indicated defendant’s innocence or his failure to understand the proceedings).
  • State v. Knight 192 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Knight 192 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
    State v. Warren, 278 Minn. 119 , State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464
  • State v. Wolske 160 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Wolske 160 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1968
    State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 .
  • State v. Seebold 158 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Seebold 158 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1968
    See State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57 , , State v. Roggenbuck, 271 Minn. 557 , , State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , , and State v. Jones, 234 Minn. 438 , .” It is our opinion that under the record and the rules applicable here the trial court must be affirmed.
  • State v. Warren 153 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Warren 153 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1967
    State v. *124 Roggenbuck, 271 Minn. 557 , 136 N. W. (2d) 857 ; State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 .
  • State v. Hayes 150 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Hayes 150 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1967
    State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 .
  • Gran v. Dasovic 147 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1966
  • Gran v. Dasovic 147 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1966
    As stated in the Oldendorf case ( 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. [2d] 314): “* * * It must be conceded that there was evidence upon which a jury might find that defendant’s truck was out of control and skidded into plaintiffs’ car because of uncontrollable factors rather than because of defendant’s negligence.” Under this well-established rule the court correctly submit
  • State v. Porter 143 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Porter 143 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1966
    Compare State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
    State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 ; State v. Jones, 234 Minn. 438 , 48 N. W. (2d) 662 ; State v. *69 McDonnell, 165 Minn. 423 , ; State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Henspeter, 199 Minn. 359 , ; State v. Prickett, 217 Minn. 629 , 15 N. W. (2d) 95 .
  • State v. Roggenbuck 136 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1965
  • Distinguished State v. Roggenbuck 136 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1965
    It relies on State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 , and claims that the instant case is distinguishable from State v. Jones, supra.
  • State v. Dehler 115 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1962
  • State v. Dehler 115 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1962
    State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 ; State v. Jones, 234 Minn. 438 , 48 N. W. (2d) 662 .