Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fussner v. Andert, 113 N.W.2d 355.

68 citing documents.

Bobbie Teeple v. Estate of Dylan Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bobbie Teeple v. Estate of Dylan Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 359
Youngquist v. WESTERN NAT. MUT. INS. CO. 716 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Youngquist v. WESTERN NAT. MUT. INS. CO. 716 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 358
Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. Gavenda 590 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1999
Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. Gavenda 590 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1999
See Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 350-53 , -58 (1961); Cashman v. Hedberg, 215 Minn. 463, 466
Ortiz v. Gavenda 574 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Ortiz v. Gavenda 574 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whiteman, Inc., (prerequisites to bringing wrongful death action are generally strictly construed, but remedial provisions should be liberally construed); Shumway v. Nelson, 259 Minn. 319, 322 , (wrongful death statute “is remedial in character and thus requires a liberal construction.”); Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 354 , (wrongful death statute is remedial in character and “it is the court’s duty to construe it liberally in light of current social conditions
Wynkoop v. Carpenter 558 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wynkoop v. Carpenter 558 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 353
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 359
Beaudry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1994
Beaudry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1994
See, e.g., Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 351-52 , (damages in a wrongful death action are for pecuniary loss).
Roers v. Engebretson 479 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Roers v. Engebretson 479 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Minnesota’s wrongful death statute “is remedial in character.” Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 354
American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Cordie 478 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Cordie 478 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 354 , Shumway v. Nelson, 259 Minn. 319, 322 , Nebola v. Minnesota Iron Co., 102 Minn. 89, 91 , 112 N.W.
FATHER a v. Moran 469 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
FATHER a v. Moran 469 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 352-53 , -59 (1961) (pecuniary loss test for parents’ recovery under wrongful death statute is outdated and unduly restrictive).
Ferguson v. Orr 427 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Ferguson v. Orr 427 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , parents brought a wrongful death action for the death of their child.
Beltrami County v. Goodman 427 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1988
Beltrami County v. Goodman 427 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1988
Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. 420 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1988
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. 420 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1988
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whitman, Inc., Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 354
Kolles v. Ross 418 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kolles v. Ross 418 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Pecuniary loss is not limited strictly to loss of income: “In Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , we expanded the concept of ‘pecuniary loss’ to include loss of advice, comfort, assistance, and protection which the jury might find to be of pecuniary value and which the survivor could reasonably have expected if the decedent had lived.” Rath v. Hamilton Standard Division of United Technolog
Steinbrecher v. McLeod Cooperative Power Ass'n 392 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Steinbrecher v. McLeod Cooperative Power Ass'n 392 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Appellants concede that Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , is the seminal case in the area.
DeRogatis Ex Rel. DeRogatis v. Mayo Clinic 390 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1986
DeRogatis Ex Rel. DeRogatis v. Mayo Clinic 390 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1986
§ 573.02 is detailed in Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 350-52 , -58 (1961), cited in Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet-Metal Co., , 228 n. 2 (Minn.1982).
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
In contrast to the prerequisites to bringing suit, the remedy provisions of the wrongful death statute have been explicitly held to be “remedial in character and it is the court’s duty to construe [them] liberally * * *.” Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 354 , citing Shumway v. Nelson, 259 Minn. 319, 322
DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co. 319 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1982
DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co. 319 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1982
The historical development of the wrongful death statute is traced in Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 350-52 , -58 (1961), cited in Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., , 228 n.2 (Minn.1982).
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. 314 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1982
Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. 314 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1982
For a discussion of the origin and development of death-by-wrongful-act statutes, see Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 350-52 , -58 (1961).
Ahrenholz v. Hennepin County 295 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1980
Ahrenholz v. Hennepin County 295 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1980
Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347
Rath v. HAMILTON STANDARD DIVISION, ETC. 292 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1980
Rath v. HAMILTON STANDARD DIVISION, ETC. 292 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1980
In Gravley v. Sea Gull Marine, Inc., this court recently stated: In Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , we expanded the concept of "pecuniary loss" to include loss of advice, comfort, assistance, and protection which the jury might find to be of pecuniary value and which the survivor could reasonably have expected if the decedent had lived.
Gravley v. Sea Gull Marine, Inc. 269 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1978
Gravley v. Sea Gull Marine, Inc. 269 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1978
1, provides that in wrongful death actions damages are “such an amount as the jury deems fair and just in reference to the pecuniary loss resulting from such death * * *.” In Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , we expanded the concept of “pecuniary loss” to include loss of advice, comfort, assistance, and protection which the jury might find to be of pecuniary value and which the surviv- or could reasonably have expected if the decedent had lived.
Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic 260 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1977
Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic 260 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1977
See, Sellnow v. Fahey, 305 Minn. 375 , Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347
Cummins v. Rachner 257 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1977
Cummins v. Rachner 257 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1977
In Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 354 , in discussing the measure of damages for wrongful death, we stated: “Moreover, it should be acknowledged that the death-by-wrongful-act statute is remedial in character and it is the court’s duty to construe it liberally in light of current social conditions.
Fitzer v. Bloom 253 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1977
Fitzer v. Bloom 253 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1977
On appeal, the parents contended they could recover for the loss of services and companionship even though the child did not contribute financially to their support, citing Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347 , a case in which this court extended the measure of damages under the Wrongful Death Act to cover not only economic loss but also the none-conomic incidence of service involved in the society and companionship of a deceased child.