Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kennedy v. Hasse, 114 N.W.2d 82.

28 citing documents.

Hedged Investment Partners, L.P. v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 578 N.W.2d 765 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Hedged Investment Partners, L.P. v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 578 N.W.2d 765 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155, 161 , (defendant waived right to exercise the release-clause provision of a purchase agreement for plaintiffs hardware store by continuing to exercise ownership, ordering merchandise, paying employees, and operating the business after he knew the plaintiffs could not fully perform the agreeme
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc. 460 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc. 460 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155, 160-61 , Gaertner v. Rees, 259 Minn. 299, 303 , Malmquist v. Peterson, 149 Minn. 223, 226 , 183 N.W.
Personalized Marketing Service, Inc. v. Stotler & Co. 447 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Personalized Marketing Service, Inc. v. Stotler & Co. 447 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
A waiver in contract law is “an intentional relinquishment of a known right, and it must ‘clearly be made to appear from the facts disclosed.’ ” Id., d at 892 (emphasis omitted) (quoting Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155, 159 , ).
Citizens National Bank of Madelia v. Mankato Implement, Inc. 441 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1989
Citizens National Bank of Madelia v. Mankato Implement, Inc. 441 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1989
In order for an action to constitute a waiver, there must be “an intentional relinquishment of a known right, and it must ‘clearly be made to appear from the facts disclosed.’ ” Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc., (emphasis omitted) (quoting Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155, 159
Citizens National Bank of Madelia v. Mankato Implement, Inc. 427 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Citizens National Bank of Madelia v. Mankato Implement, Inc. 427 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
A waiver in contract law is “an intentional relinquishment of a known right, and it must ‘clearly be made to appear from the facts disclosed.’ ” Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc., (emphasis omitted) (quoting Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155, 159 , ).
Thompson v. Kromhout 413 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Thompson v. Kromhout 413 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155, 161 , -87 (1962).
Silver Ball Too, Ltd. v. B & E Enterprises 390 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Silver Ball Too, Ltd. v. B & E Enterprises 390 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In contract law, a waiver is defined as an intentional relinquishment of a known right, and it must “clearly be made to appear from the facts disclosed.” Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc., (emphasis omitted) (quoting *15 Kennedy v. Haase, 262 Minn. 155, 159 , ).
Appollo v. Reynolds 364 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Appollo v. Reynolds 364 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155
Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc. 320 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1982
Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc. 320 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1982
In contract law, a waiver is defined as an intentional relinquishment of a known right, and it must “clearly be made to appear from the facts disclosed.” Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155, 159 , see J. Calamari & J. Perillo, The Law of Contracts 446 (2d ed. 1977).
Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc. 252 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1977
Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc. 252 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1977
Furuseth v. Olson, 297 Minn. 491 , Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155
State v. Turner 239 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1976
State v. Turner 239 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1976
“ ‘A. Sir, am I on trial for Alice Smith or Darwin Morrow ?’ ” We held ( 262 Minn. 170 , ): “It is obvious from a reading of the record that defendant is an uneducated person, given to the use of colorful and emphatic language common to persons of his background.
State v. Martin 211 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1973
State v. Martin 211 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1973
In the instant case, defendant’s drug addiction had no, relationship to the subject of the examination and his unresponsive answer, as we said in the Flowers case, was simply “the use of colorful and emphatic language common to persons of his background.” 262 Minn. 170 , .
Furuseth v. Olson 210 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1973
Furuseth v. Olson 210 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1973
Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155
Brownlee v. Ertzos 182 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1970
Brownlee v. Ertzos 182 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1970
Kennedy v. Hasse, 262 Minn. 155 , 114 N. W. (2d) 82 , involved a contract for the sale of a hardware store for about $39,000, $3,683 of which was to be secured by “a factors lien or chattel mortgage.” Because the contract did not specify the nature of the property so to be secured, the defendant resisted specific performance on the ground that this