Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance, 115 N.W.2d 40.

53 citing documents.

Benchmark Investments, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Where the language is unambiguous, [] courts must give the language its ordinary meaning and not redraft the 12 contract.” Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., 262 Minn. 378, 385
Swanson v. Brewster 784 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2010
Soo Line Railroad v. Brown's Crew Car of Wyoming 694 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Soo Line Railroad v. Brown's Crew Car of Wyoming 694 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Seaway Port Authority of Duluth v. Midland Insurance Co. 430 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Seaway Port Authority of Duluth v. Midland Insurance Co. 430 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
If a policy is unambiguous, the court “must give the language its ' ordinary meaning and not redraft the contract.” (citing Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., 262 Minn. 378, 385 , ).
Alexandra House, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 419 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Alexandra House, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 419 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance Company, 262 Minn. 378, 391
Warren v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 418 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Warren v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 418 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance Company, 262 Minn. 378, 391
Richards v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 417 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Richards v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 417 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance Company, 262 Minn. 387, 391
NAT. FARMERS UNION PROP. & CAS. v. Anderson 372 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
NAT. FARMERS UNION PROP. & CAS. v. Anderson 372 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., 262 Minn. 378, 385
Twin City Hide v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 358 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Twin City Hide v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 358 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance Company, 262 Minn. 378 , the court held: Where the insurance contract is unambiguous, the language used must be given its ordinary and usual meaning, the same as any other contract, and we have no more right to redraft an insurance contract under the guise of strict construction to reach a result that we would prefer t
Pederson v. All Nation Insurance Co. 294 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1980
Pederson v. All Nation Insurance Co. 294 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1980
Co., 262 Minn. 378 , Bartholet v. Berkness, 291 Minn. 123 , and Van Overbeke v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
DiLuzio v. Home Mutual Insurance Co. 289 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 1980
DiLuzio v. Home Mutual Insurance Co. 289 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 1980
Graber v. Lametti Construction Co., 293 Minn. 24 , Simon v. Milwaukee Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 262 Minn. 378
LeDoux v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. 262 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1978
LeDoux v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. 262 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1978
Dairyland Insurance v. Implement Dealers Insurance 199 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1972
Dairyland Insurance v. Implement Dealers Insurance 199 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1972
Co. 262 Minn. 378 , Lang v. General Ins.
Bartholet v. Berkness 189 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1971
Bartholet v. Berkness 189 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1971
Co. 262 Minn. 378 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40 ; Tomlyanovich v. Tomlyanovich, 239 Minn. 250 , 58 N. W. (2d) 855 , 50 A. L. R. (2d) 108; 7 Am.
Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Company 182 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1970
Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Company 182 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1970
Co. 262 Minn. 378, 385 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40, 45 ; Bobich v. Oja, 258 Minn. 287 , 104 N. W. (2d) 19 .
Fitch v. Bye 180 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1970
Fitch v. Bye 180 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1970
Co. 262 Minn. 378 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40 .
Boedigheimer v. Taylor 178 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1970
Boedigheimer v. Taylor 178 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1970
Co. 262 Minn. 378 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40 , we held the phrase “furnished for regular use” to be unambiguous.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Nyquist 175 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1970
Farkas v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. 173 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1969
Farkas v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. 173 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1969
*328 Co. 262 Minn. 378, 391 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40, 49 , where the meaning of the term “insured” was at issue, it was stated: “* * =i= ]y[uch as we might dislike exclusionary clauses which may mislead the insured, an insurance policy is still a contract, and where its provisions are unambiguous the courts have no right to thrust upon the insur
Gareis v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Emp. Ins. Co. 169 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1969
Gareis v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Emp. Ins. Co. 169 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1969
Co. 262 Minn. 378 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40 ; Tomlyanovich v. Tomlyanovich, supra.
Stein v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 161 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1968
Stein v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 161 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1968
Co. 262 Minn. 378 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40 , and Shake v. Westchester Fire Ins.
Fawcett House, Inc. v. Great Central Insurance Co. 159 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 1968
Fawcett House, Inc. v. Great Central Insurance Co. 159 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 1968
Co. 262 Minn. 378 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40 .
MacRUNNEL v. NORTHLAND INSURANCE COMPANY 153 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1967
MacRUNNEL v. NORTHLAND INSURANCE COMPANY 153 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1967
Co. 262 Minn. 378 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40 .
LeRoux v. Edmundson 148 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1967
LeRoux v. Edmundson 148 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1967
Co. 262 Minn. 378 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40 .
Fruchtman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 142 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1966
Fruchtman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 142 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1966
Co. 262 Minn. 378, 390 , 115 N. W. (2d) 40, 49 .
Gabrelcik v. National Indemnity Co. 131 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1964