Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 115 N.W.2d 22.

45 citing documents.

A19-0155 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co., (applying a similar reasoning to silicosis, an “insidious disease” that “develops over a long period of time”).
State v. Turchick 436 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Turchick 436 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 262 Minn. 393, 405-06
Radermecher v. FMC Corp. 375 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1985
Radermecher v. FMC Corp. 375 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1985
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 262 Minn. 393, 400-01
State v. Corbin 343 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Corbin 343 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
1 (1982); Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 262 Minn. 393, 399
Guggenberger v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 332 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1983
Marriage of Janssen v. Janssen 331 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1983
Marriage of Janssen v. Janssen 331 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1983
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 262 Minn. 393, 398
Abram v. Art Goebel Ford 327 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1982
Abram v. Art Goebel Ford 327 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1982
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 262 Minn. 393, 401 , Notch v. Victory Granite Co., 306 Minn. 495, 504
Lockwood v. Independent School District No. 877 312 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1981
Kahn v. State 289 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1980
Kahn v. State 289 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1980
In the same vein, we stated in Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 262 Minn. 393 , that: * * * [T]he Workmen’s Compensation Act is a remedial statute and must be liberally construed to effectuate its purpose.
Zak v. Gypsy 279 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1979
Zak v. Gypsy 279 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1979
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 262 Minn. 393, 405 , Kolbeck v. Myhra, 255 Minn. 341, 344
Notch v. Victory Granite Co. 238 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1976
Notch v. Victory Granite Co. 238 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1976
That test is *503 definite and it includes partial as well as total disability.” Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393, 401
Bertsch v. Varnum Lumber & Fuel Co. 228 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1975
Bertsch v. Varnum Lumber & Fuel Co. 228 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1975
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393
Robertson v. Park Brick Finishers 220 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1974
Robertson v. Park Brick Finishers 220 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1974
Petter v. K. W. McKee, Inc. 270 Minn. 362 , Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393
Robertson v. Johnson 200 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1972
Robertson v. Johnson 200 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1972
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393 , Mankato Citizens Tel.
Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction Company 197 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1972
Graber v. Peter Lametti Construction Company 197 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1972
Lahti v. M. A. Hanna Co. supra; Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393 , Ulve v. Bemidji Co-op.
McCrae v. Brandt Aero Service 168 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1969
McCrae v. Brandt Aero Service 168 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1969
Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266 ; McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 ; and Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22 .
Kalthoff v. Deere and Company 161 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1968
Kalthoff v. Deere and Company 161 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1968
in the Minnesota Foreign Corporation Act should govern here because “[i]t is the rule that specific provisions in a statute control general provisions; that provisions of a complete and specific act will prevail over general language of another, prior provision, and if there is conflict between different statutes as to the same matter, the later statute prevails.” Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393, 399 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22, 26 .
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co. 158 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1968
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co. 158 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1968
In Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393, 404 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22, 30 , the court discussed when the statute of limitations in the Workmen’s Compensation Act begins to run against an employee who has contracted silicosis: “We have said that the contracting of silicosis is not a matter of a moment, or an occasion, but something which develops over a long peri
Fitch v. FARMERS UNION G. TERM. ASS'N (AMBER MILL. D.) 143 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1966
Fitch v. FARMERS UNION G. TERM. ASS'N (AMBER MILL. D.) 143 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1966
See, Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22 .
Reese v. Preston Marketing Association 142 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1966
Reese v. Preston Marketing Association 142 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1966
7 Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393, 407 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22, 31 .
Petter v. K. W. McKee, Inc. 133 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1965
Petter v. K. W. McKee, Inc. 133 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1965
son may be able to perform some parts of an occupation he may be held to be totally disabled unless he is able to perform the substantial and material parts of some gainful work or occupation with reasonable continuity.’ ” For other cases involving a finding of total permanent disability, see McGuire v. Viking Tool & Die Co. 258 Minn. 336 , 104 N. W. (2d) 519 ; Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22 ; Luthens v. Glencoe Red & White Store, 264 Minn. 26 , 117 N.
Martin v. Swift & Company 130 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1964
Martin v. Swift & Company 130 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1964
1 See, Jacobson v. Uptown Transfer & Storage Co. 268 Minn. 336 , 129 *220 N. W. (2d) 41; Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393, 406 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22, 31 ; Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 257 Minn. 108, 112 , 100 N. W. (2d) 96, 99 ; Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214, 219 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266, 269 ; Lee v. Minneapolis St.
Lahti v. M. A. Hanna Co. 120 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1963
Distinguished Lahti v. M. A. Hanna Co. 120 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1963
Our decision in Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22 , relied on by the employee, is not controlling because it is distinguishable on the facts.
Blattner v. Loyal Order of Moose 117 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1962
Blattner v. Loyal Order of Moose 117 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1962
5 Fink v. Cold .Spring Granite Co. 262 Minn. 393, 406 , 115 N. W. (2d) 22 .