Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 115 N.W.2d 734.

28 citing documents.

EP Land LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
739- 41 (Minn. 1962) (restating a previous holding from 1928 that a gas station does not itself create a nuisance and then stating that Minneapolis’s “underlying motive” of “purely aesthetic considerations” to deny Olsen’s permit was unjust).
Chase v. City of Minneapolis 401 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Chase v. City of Minneapolis 401 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“The council * * * is bound by the comprehensive zoning classification * * Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1, 8 , (emphasis added); see also *413 Horbal, d at 7 (mere community opposition not legally sufficient for denial).
Luger v. City of Burnsville 295 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1980
Luger v. City of Burnsville 295 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1980
That principle was stated more strongly in an earlier case, again in the context of reversing a denial of plaintiff’s application for a special permit: “It is settled that purely aesthetic considerations do not form a sound basis for nullifying or destroying definite or valuable interests in property without compensation therefor to the owner.” Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1, 11
Town of Paradise Valley v. Gulf Leisure Corp. 557 P.2d 532 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn Park 211 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1973
Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn Park 211 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1973
See, Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1, 13
Inland Construction Co. v. City of Bloomington 195 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1972
Inland Construction Co. v. City of Bloomington 195 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1972
Louis Park, 266 Minn. 46 , Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1
Westling v. City of St. Louis Park 170 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1969
Westling v. City of St. Louis Park 170 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1969
Paul, 275 Minn. 440 , 147 N. W. (2d) 571 ; Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1 , 115 N. W. (2d) 734 ; Golden v. City of St.
Zylka v. City of Crystal 167 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1969
Zylka v. City of Crystal 167 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1969
of the City Council * * * in denying plaintiff’s Application for a special use permit was arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, discriminatory, confiscatory and void” and “denied plaintiff equal protection under the law in violation of the Constitutions of the State of Minnesota and the United States of America.” The city makes four basic arguments on appeal: (1) That Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1 , 115 N. W. (2d) 734 , relied on heavily by the trial court, is not in fact controlling;
Sanderson v. City of Willmar 162 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1968
Sanderson v. City of Willmar 162 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1968
See, also, Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1 , 115 N. W. (2d) 734 ; Pearce v. Village of Edina, 263 Minn. 553 , 118 N. W. (2d) 659 .
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka 162 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka 162 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
4 See, Pearce v. Village of Edina, 263 Minn. 553 , 118 N. W. (2d) 659 ; Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1 , 115 N. W. (2d) 734 .
Olsen v. City of Hopkins 149 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1967
Olsen v. City of Hopkins 149 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1967
11 Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1 , 115 N. W. (2d) 734 ; Kiges v. City of St.
Ostrand v. Village of North St. Paul 147 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1966
Ostrand v. Village of North St. Paul 147 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1966
Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, 267 Minn. 155 , 125 N. W. (2d) 583 ; Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1 , 115 N. W. (2d) 734 .
Alexander v. City of Minneapolis 125 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 1963
Alexander v. City of Minneapolis 125 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 1963
Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1 , 115 N. W. (2d) 734 ; Pearce v. Village of Edina, 263 Minn. 553 , 118 N. W. (2d) 659 .
Golden v. City of St. Louis Park 122 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1963
Golden v. City of St. Louis Park 122 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1963
Paul, 240 Minn. 522 , 62 N. W. (2d) 363 ; Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1 , 115 N. W. (2d) 734 ; Pearce v. Village of Edina, 263 Minn. 553 , 118 Ñ. W. (2d) 659.
Pearce v. Village of Edina 118 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1962
Pearce v. Village of Edina 118 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1962
Olsen v. City of Minneapolis, 263 Minn. 1 , 115 *570 N. W. (2d) 734; State ex rel.