Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 117 N.W.2d 213.

141 citing documents.

Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
Thomsen v. Independent School District No. 91, 309 Minn. 391 , Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520 , Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co., 197 Minn. 291 , 266 N.W.
Brookshaw v. South St. Paul Feed, Inc. 381 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Brookshaw v. South St. Paul Feed, Inc. 381 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520, 532
Dumas v. Kessler & Maguire Funeral Home, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Dumas v. Kessler & Maguire Funeral Home, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cedarstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520, 533
House v. Baxter 371 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
House v. Baxter 371 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cedarstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520
Tobias v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc. 362 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Tobias v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc. 362 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520
Speckel Ex Rel. Speckel v. Perkins 364 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Speckel Ex Rel. Speckel v. Perkins 364 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bruntjen Co., 249 Minn. 281, 287 , Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520, 532 , (“Expressions of mutual assent, by words or conduct, must be judged objectively, not subjectively”).
Bakker v. Metropolitan Pediatric, P. A. 355 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bakker v. Metropolitan Pediatric, P. A. 355 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Degen v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc., 260 Minn. 424 , Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520
Hyduke v. Grant 351 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hyduke v. Grant 351 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wrongful discharge: In an employment-at-will situation, the Minnesota Supreme Court still recognizes the rule set forth in Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520 , that an employee may be discharged for any reason or for no reason at all.
Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co. 351 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co. 351 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
872 (1936) and Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520
Pine River State Bank v. Mettille 333 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1983
Pine River State Bank v. Mettille 333 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1983
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520, 532
General Drivers, Local 346 v. Aitkin County Board 320 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1982
General Drivers, Local 346 v. Aitkin County Board 320 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1982
179.571 (1969), which was repealed July 1, 1972, or Minn. Stat. 179.76, the present statute, stating that both statutes provide for “right of review of any grievance arising out of the interpretation of or adherence to terms and conditions of employment” and their rights must be ascertained by the nature of their contract of employment, citing Cedarstrand [Cederstrand] vs. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520 , in which case it was held that the usual employer-employee relationship is terminable
451 Corp. v. Pension System for Policemen & Firemen 310 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1981
451 Corp. v. Pension System for Policemen & Firemen 310 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1981
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520, 532
Charles v. Hill 260 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1977
Charles v. Hill 260 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1977
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520
Thomsen v. Independent School District No. 91 244 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1976
Thomsen v. Independent School District No. 91 244 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1976
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520
Wild v. Rarig 234 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1975
Wild v. Rarig 234 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1975
ants Manual provides in pertinent part as follows: “D. Termination Procedure “Research grants may be terminated at any time by the grantee institution upon written notification from an authorized institution official to the sponsoring Institute or Division of the Public Health Service.” See, Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co. 197 Minn. 291 , Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520
Boe v. Polk County Library Board 217 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1974
Boe v. Polk County Library Board 217 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1974
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520
North Star Center, Inc. v. Sibley Bowl, Inc. 205 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1973
North Star Center, Inc. v. Sibley Bowl, Inc. 205 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1973
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520
Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc. 200 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1972
Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc. 200 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1972
1 Other Minnesota cases include: Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520 , Degen v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc. 260 Minn. 424 , Smith v. St.
Lundeen v. Cozy Cab Manufacturing Company 179 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1970
Lundeen v. Cozy Cab Manufacturing Company 179 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1970
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520, 532 , 117 N. W. (2d) 213, 221 .
School Dist. No. 69 of Maricopa County v. Altherr 458 P.2d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Capital Warehouse Co. v. McGill-Warner-Farnham Co. 149 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1967
Capital Warehouse Co. v. McGill-Warner-Farnham Co. 149 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1967
Creamery Co. 248 Minn. 184, 189 , 79 N. W. (2d) 142, 146 ; Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, 263 Minn. 520, 532 , 117 N. W. (2d) 213, 221 ; Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc. 256 Minn. 339, 354 , 98 N. W. (2d) 257, 268 ; Markmann v. H. A. Bruntjen Co. 249 Minn. 281, 287 , 81 N.W.