DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Templin v. Crestliner, Inc., 116 N.W.2d 178.

28 citing documents.

  • Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    v. Short, Templin v. Crestliner, Inc., 263 Minn. 149, 151
  • Kath v. Burlington Northern Railroad 441 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • Kath v. Burlington Northern Railroad 441 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    Templin v. Crestliner, Inc., 263 Minn. 149, 151-52
  • Covington v. Pritchett 428 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Covington v. Pritchett 428 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    Templin v. Crestliner, Inc., 263 Minn. 149, 151
  • Fleahman v. Lehman 388 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Fleahman v. Lehman 388 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    On appeal we will substitute our judgment for that of the jury “only if there is no evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict or if it is manifestly and palpably against the weight of the evidence.” (quoting Templin v. Crestliner, Inc., 263 Minn. 149, 151 , ).
  • Coughlin v. LaBounty 354 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Coughlin v. LaBounty 354 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Templin v. Crestliner, Inc., 263 Minn. 149
  • Fallin v. Maplewood-North St. Paul District No. 622 348 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Fallin v. Maplewood-North St. Paul District No. 622 348 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Templin v. Crestliner, Inc., 263 Minn. 149
  • Vikse v. Flaby 316 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1982
  • Vikse v. Flaby 316 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1982
    this court said: Where a party seeks a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not justified by the evidence, we will substitute our judgment for that of the jury “only if there is no evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict or if it is manifestly and palpably against the weight of the evidence.” (quoting Templin v. Crestliner, Inc., 263 Minn. 149, 151 , ).
  • Otterness v. Horsley 263 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1978
  • Otterness v. Horsley 263 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1978
    Where a party seeks a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not justified by the evidence, we will substitute our judgment for that of the jury “only if there is no evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict or if it is manifestly and palpably against the weight of the evidence.” Templin v. Crestliner, Inc., 263 Minn. 149, 151
  • Stumne v. Village Sports & Gas 243 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1976
  • Stumne v. Village Sports & Gas 243 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1976
    trial on the grounds that the verdict was not justified by the evidence is set forth in the case of Austin v. Rosecke, 240 Minn. 321, 324 , as follows: “* * * [Tjhe order will be reversed on appeal only if there is no evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict or if it is manifestly and palpably against the weight of the evidence.” Templin v. Crestliner, Inc. 263 Minn. 149 , accord, Hestad v. Pennsylvania Life Ins.
  • Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild 225 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1975
  • Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild 225 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1975
    Templin v. Crestliner, Inc. 263 Minn. 149
  • Martin v. Bussert 193 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1971
  • Martin v. Bussert 193 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1971
    Our decisions in that area of the law are reviewed in Templin v. Crestliner, Inc. 263 Minn. 149, 151 , wherein we said: “It is well settled in this state that an order denying a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not justified by the evidence will be reversed on appeal only if there is no evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict or if it is manifestly
  • Cormican v. Parsons 163 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1968
  • Cormican v. Parsons 163 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1968
    See, Smith v. Hencir-Nichols, Inc. 276 Minn. 390 , 150 N. W. (2d) 556 ; Templin v. Crestliner, Inc. 263 Minn. 149 , 116 N. W. (2d) 178 ; Bush v. Havir, 253 Minn 318, 91 N. W. (2d) 784 .
  • Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
  • Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
    Templin v. Crestliner, Inc. 263 Minn. 149 , 116 N. W. (2d) 178 .
  • Gardner v. Germain 117 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1962
  • Gardner v. Germain 117 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1962
    2 Templin v. Crestliner, Inc. 263 Minn. 149 , 116 N. W. (2d) 178 .