DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Murphy v. Hennen, 119 N.W.2d 489.

31 citing documents.

  • Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
  • Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
    Our conclusion is further supported by our holding in Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457
  • Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 730 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • Rambaum v. Swisher 423 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Rambaum v. Swisher 423 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    See, e.g., Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457, 461-62 , (sales to minors); Strand v. Village of Watson, 245 Minn. 414, 422 , (sales to obviously intoxicated persons); Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31, 33 , 163 N.W.
  • Danielson v. Johnson 366 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Danielson v. Johnson 366 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457
  • State v. Dewey 272 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Dewey 272 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1978
    The approach of the Carmody case has been followed by this court in numerous cases since then: Schoeb v. Cowles, 279 Minn. 331 , Montagne v. Stenvold, 276 Minn. 547 , Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457 , McNab v. Jeppesen, 258 Minn. 15
  • Hammerschmidt v. Moore 274 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1978
  • Hammerschmidt v. Moore 274 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1978
    Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457 , .
  • Bohach v. Thompson 239 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1976
  • Bohach v. Thompson 239 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1976
    In Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457, 464 , we said: “The admissibility of a claimed expert’s opinion is within the *335 discretion of the court, and any ruling will not be reversed unless there is an abuse of discretion which results in prejudice to the objector.” Therefore, the question on this appeal is whether the trial
  • Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Lafortune 179 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1970
  • Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Lafortune 179 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1970
    1 Beckman v. Schroeder, 224 Minn. 370 , 28 N. W. (2d) 629 ; Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 251 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30, 39 ; Carmody v. Aho, 251 Minn. 19, 23 , 86 N. W. (2d) 692, 695 ; and Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457, 464 , 119 N. W. (2d) 489, 493 .
  • Trail v. Village of Elk River 175 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1970
  • Trail v. Village of Elk River 175 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1970
    In Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457, 463 , 119 N. W. (2d) 489, 493 , this court said: *390 “* * * We have held that intoxicants consumed as a result of illegal sales need not be the sole cause of intoxication.
  • Tayam v. Executive Aero, Inc. 166 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1969
  • Tayam v. Executive Aero, Inc. 166 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1969
    See, e. g., Teslow v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. 273 Minn. 309 , 141 N. W. (2d) 507 ; Peters v. Peterson, 265 Minn. 131 , 120 N. W. (2d) 846 , 9 A. L. R. (3d) 1430; Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457 , 119 N. W. (2d) 489 .
  • Skaja v. Andrews Hotel Company 161 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1968
  • Skaja v. Andrews Hotel Company 161 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1968
    Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457 , 119 N. W. (2d) 489 .
  • Schoeb v. Cowles 156 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1968
  • Schoeb v. Cowles 156 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1968
    Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457 , 119 N. W. (2d) 489 ; Carmody v. Aho, 251 Minn. 19 , 86 N. W. (2d) 692 .
  • Montagne v. Stenvold 148 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1967
  • Montagne v. Stenvold 148 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1967
    This suspected substitution of the opinion of a claimed expert for the combined judgment of the jury based on the testimony of those who witnessed the accident is the prejudice which the rule is designed to prevent as we recently explained in Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457 , 119 N. W. (2d) 489 .
  • Kvanli v. Village of Watson 139 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1965
  • Kvanli v. Village of Watson 139 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1965
    Benes v. Campion, 186 Minn. 578 , ; Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457 , 119 N. W. (2d) 489 , noted in 48 Minn. L. Rev. 126 .
  • Bundy v. City of Fridley 122 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1963
  • Bundy v. City of Fridley 122 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1963
    guardian, or next friend, as the court directs; and all suits for damages under this section shall be by civil action in any court of this state having jurisdiction thereof.” 2 Hahn v. City of Ortonville, 238 Minn. 428 , 57 N. W. (2d) 254 ; Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875; Lund v. Village of Watson, 260 Minn. 273 , 109 N. W. (2d) 564 ; and Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457 , 119 N. W. (2d) 489 .
  • Dahl v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK MINNEAPOLIS 121 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1963
  • Dahl v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK MINNEAPOLIS 121 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1963
    See, Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457 , 119 N. W. (2d) 489 ; Randall v. Village of Excelsior, 258 Minn. 81 , 103 N. W. (2d) 131 ; Ritter v. Village of Appleton, 254 Minn. 30 , 93 N. W. (2d) 683 ; Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, supra; Schmidt v. Driscoll Hotel, Inc. 249 Minn. 376 , 82 N. W. (2d) 365 ; Adamson v. Dougherty, supra; Strand v. Village of Wat