Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hendrickson v. State, 127 N.W.2d 165.

87 citing documents.

Bulletin Publishing Corp. v. City of Cottage Grove 379 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bulletin Publishing Corp. v. City of Cottage Grove 379 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 445-46 , -73 (1964) (footnotes omitted); see State v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14
City of Chisago City v. Holt 360 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
City of Chisago City v. Holt 360 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson Brothers Grocery, Inc. v. State, Department of Highways, 304 Minn. 75 , Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436
McShane v. City of Faribault 292 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
McShane v. City of Faribault 292 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
See, e. g., Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Comm’n, 298 Minn. 471 , Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436 , Austin v. Village of Tonka Bay, 130 Minn. 359 , 153 N.W.
Courteaus, Inc. v. State, Department of Highways Ex Rel. Spannaus 268 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1978
Courteaus, Inc. v. State, Department of Highways Ex Rel. Spannaus 268 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1978
*67 In Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436 , we recognized that an abutting property owner has a right to compensation for an unreasonable restriction of his formerly direct access to a conventional highway which was converted to a controlled-access thoroughfare on the existing and abutting right-of-way.
Johnson v. City of Plymouth 263 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1978
Johnson v. City of Plymouth 263 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1978
See, Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 446 , , *606 173 (1964); State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14 , State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc., 285 Minn. 1 , Johnson Bros. Grocery v. State, Dept. of Highways, 304 Minn. 75
Johnson Bros. Grocery, Inc. v. State, Department of Highways 229 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1975
Johnson Bros. Grocery, Inc. v. State, Department of Highways 229 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1975
We are compelled to affirm under the controlling authority of Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436
Recke v. State 215 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1974
Recke v. State 215 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1974
On the other hand, as we said in Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 442 , : ¡<* * * 0f authority, with which we agree, holds that a property owner has no vested interest in the continued flow of the main stream of through traffic, and the state may *503 divert it to a new location without being liable for consequential economic losses which owners abut
Prow's Motel, Inc. v. State 200 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1972
Prow's Motel, Inc. v. State 200 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1972
Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 446
Schmidt v. Village of Mapleview 196 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1972
Schmidt v. Village of Mapleview 196 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1972
See, State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , State, by Mondale, v. Gannons, Inc. 275 Minn. 14 , Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436
BENSON HOTEL CORPORATION v. City of Minneapolis 187 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1971
BENSON HOTEL CORPORATION v. City of Minneapolis 187 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1971
We find nothing unique in the circumstances of the case before us. Benson has not sought damages, and under our decision in Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 446 , 127 N. W. (2d) 165, 173 , it has no cause of action for “diversion of traffic or for loss of customers, business, goodwill, income, or profits” simply because of its circuity of access.
Gibson v. Commissioner of Highways 178 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1970
Gibson v. Commissioner of Highways 178 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1970
Thomsen v. State, by Head, 284 Minn. 468 , 170 N. W. (2d) 575 ; Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436 , 127 N. W. (2d) 165 ; State, by Lord, v. Casey, 263 Minn. 47 , 115 N. W. (2d) 749 .
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Schaffer 467 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1970
State v. Prow's Motel, Inc. 171 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1969
State v. Prow's Motel, Inc. 171 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1969
Upon a trial de novo, the trial court, quite likely following dicta in Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436 , 127 N. W. (2d) 165 , in effect submitted to the jury the issue of whether there had been a “taking” by the state of respondent’s right of reasonable, suitable, and convenient access.
Thomsen v. State 170 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 1969
Thomsen v. State 170 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 1969
Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436 , 127 N. W. (2d) 165 ; State, by Lord, v. Casey, 263 Minn. 47 , 115 N. W. (2d) 749 ; 4 Nichols, Eminent Domain (Rev. 3 ed.) § 14.1 [1].
State v. Saugen 169 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1969
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Wilson 420 P.2d 992 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Gannons Inc. 145 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1966
State v. Larsen 145 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1966
State v. Gannons Inc. 145 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1966
The rules applicable where damages are sought for denial or reduction of rights of access have been established in this state by the recent case of Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436 , , where this court held that "[n]otwithstanding the availability of a frontage road from which his abutting property has circuitous access to the main thoroughfare at remote interchanges, an owner suffers compensable damage if the highway to which he previously had immediate and unlimited access
State v. Larsen 145 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1966
See, State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc. 275 Minn. 14 , 145 N. W. (2d) 321 ; State, by Lord, v. Kohler, 268 Minn. 77 , 128 N. W. (2d) 90 ; Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436 , 127 N. W. (2d) 165 .
State v. Gannons Inc. 145 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1966
State v. Gannons Inc. 145 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1966
The rules applicable where damages are sought for denial or reduction of rights of access have been established in this state by the recent case of Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436 , 127 N. W. (2d) 165, 167 , where this court held that ‘‘[n]otwithstanding the availability of a frontage road from which his abutting property has circuitous access to the main thoroughfare at remote interchanges, an owner suffers compensable damage if the highway to which he previously had immediate and unlimited
State v. Kohler 128 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1964
State v. Kohler 128 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1964
The issue raised by appellant has been fully considered by this court in Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436 , 127 N. W. (2d) 165 .