Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Costello v. Johnson, 121 N.W.2d 70.

31 citing documents.

Snowman Construction, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Evidentiary “weight and the credibility of the witnesses is usually for the trier of fact to determine, and it is not compelled to believe any witness merely because his testimony is uncontradicted.”
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Firkus Minn. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Firkus Minn. 2026
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brendon Alan Tempel. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(noting that a district court as finder of fact is not required to believe even uncontradicted testimony if there are reasonable grounds to doubt its credibility).
Minn. 2022
This is an ordinary breach-of- contract action in which Vermillion had the burden of proving the oral agreement “by a fair preponderance of the evidence.”
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
14 A trier of fact “is not compelled to believe any witness merely because his testimony is uncontradicted.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Shawdy Kiani, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The fact-finder “is not compelled to believe any witness merely because [her] testimony is uncontradicted.”
Sela Roofing and Remodeling, Inc., d/b/a as Sela Gutter Connection, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 211, d 70, 76 (1963) (holding that “uncontradict ed testimony does not compel a finding in accordance therewith” and that fact-finder “is not compelled to believe any witness merely because his testimony is uncontradicted”).
Michael O'Byrne v. Spring Valley Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael O'Byrne v. Spring Valley Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 211
Gellert v. Eginton 770 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Gellert v. Eginton 770 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 211
MCC INVESTMENTS v. Crystal Properties 451 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
MCC INVESTMENTS v. Crystal Properties 451 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 211
St. Croix Development, Inc. v. City of Apple Valley 446 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
St. Croix Development, Inc. v. City of Apple Valley 446 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 211
Lieberman Music Co. v. Hagen 404 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lieberman Music Co. v. Hagen 404 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 211
Park-Lake Car Wash, Inc. v. Springer 394 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Park-Lake Car Wash, Inc. v. Springer 394 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 211
Wellens v. Thuening 393 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wellens v. Thuening 393 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204
Olson, Clough & Straumann v. Trayne Properties 392 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Olson, Clough & Straumann v. Trayne Properties 392 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cf. Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 208 , (a plaintiff must prove damages by a fair preponderance of the evidence).
Roettger v. United Hospitals of St. Paul, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Roettger v. United Hospitals of St. Paul, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See, e.g., Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 211 , Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 204
Frank v. Jansen 226 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1975
Frank v. Jansen 226 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1975
In the case of Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204 , the buyers raised a contractual provision calling for forfeiture of earnest money as a defense in a seller’s action for actual damages.
Kelley v. Olson 136 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1965
Kelley v. Olson 136 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1965
See, Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 208 , 121 N. W. (2d) 70, 74 .