Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 122 N.W.2d 26.

199 citing documents.

Northern States Power Company v. MINNESOTA METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 684 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2004
Northern States Power Company v. MINNESOTA METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 684 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2004
Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc. 683 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2004
Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc. 683 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2004
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan 673 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan 673 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., -40 (Minn.2000) (citing N. States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , ).
Noske v. Friedberg 670 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 2003
Noske v. Friedberg 670 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 2003
Co., -40 (Minn.2000) (quoting N. States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , ).
Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc. 670 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc. 670 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., -40 (Minn.2000) (citation omitted) (quoting Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , ).
Noske v. Friedberg 656 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Noske v. Friedberg 656 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
N. States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , (citation omitted).
Harbor Broadcasting, Inc. v. Boundary Waters Broadcasters, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Harbor Broadcasting, Inc. v. Boundary Waters Broadcasters, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
N. States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , (citation omitted).
Davies v. West Publishing Co. 622 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Davies v. West Publishing Co. 622 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 397 , -29 (1963) (trespass); State Dep’t of Labor & Indus.
Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc. 621 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 2001
Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc. 621 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 2001
See, e.g., Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 394 , Conwed Corp. v. Employers Reinsurance Corp., 816 F.Supp.
Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 616 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2000
Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 616 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2000
We have held it is immaterial whether or not the plaintiff can prove the facts alleged, see Royal Realty Co., 244 Minn. at 290 , d at 670 , and we will not uphold a Rule 12.02(e) dismissal “if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s *740 theory, to grant the relief demanded!,]” Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Doyle v. Kuch 611 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Doyle v. Kuch 611 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
The Minnesota Supreme Court explained the limited function served by a rule 12.02(e) motion to dismiss in Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , : A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss based on Rule 12.02(5) [current version at 12.02(e) ] if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.
Anderson v. Rengachary 608 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 2000
Professional Management Associates, Inc. v. Coss 598 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Professional Management Associates, Inc. v. Coss 598 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(quoting Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , ).
Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections 598 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections 598 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Wallin contends that the district court dismissed a number of his claims on the pleadings alone and therefore it is this court’s task to determine whether “it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co. 594 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co. 594 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 396
St. James Capital Corp. v. Pallet Recycling Associates of North America, Inc. 589 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
St. James Capital Corp. v. Pallet Recycling Associates of North America, Inc. 589 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Special Force Ministries v. WCCO Television 584 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Special Force Ministries v. WCCO Television 584 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
at 404-05 ; see also Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 396 , (“Wrongful conduct following an authorized entry upon the land can result in trespass.”) Whether a party has given consent is a fact question for the jury.
Wessin v. Archives Corp. 581 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Wessin v. Archives Corp. 581 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 396
Barton v. Moore 558 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1997
Barton v. Moore 558 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1997
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 394
Rer v. Jg 552 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
R.E.R. v. J.G. 552 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
R.E.R. v. J.G. 552 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
P. 12.02(e) (allowing defendants to move for the dismissal of a complaint based on its failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted); Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , (stating a claim is sufficient if any evidence will permit the granting of the relief demanded).
Rer v. Jg 552 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
P. 12.02(e) (allowing defendants to move for the dismissal of a complaint based on its failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted); Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , (stating a claim is sufficient if any evidence will permit the granting of the relief demanded).
614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 547 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 547 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , (upholding dismissal of “intrinsically inconsistent” pleadings).
State Bank of Young America v. Fabel 530 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State Bank of Young America v. Fabel 530 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Elzie, d at 32 (quoting Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , ).
Copeland v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 526 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Copeland v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 526 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Northern States Poiver Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 396
Anderson v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 520 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Anderson v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 520 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Northern States Power v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , (stating that a claim is sufficient if it is possible to grant the relief demanded on any evidence which might be provided).
In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 517 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1994

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by