Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Briton, 121 N.W.2d 577.

26 citing documents.

State v. Combs 504 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Combs 504 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Combs argues that State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , overruled on other grounds by State v. Clark, 270 Minn. 538 , which allows only consideration of the foreign definition of the offense, should control.
Hill v. State 483 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1992
Hill v. State 483 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1992
The defense bases this on State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326
State v. Stutelberg 435 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Stutelberg 435 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Citing State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , overruled on other grounds State v. Clark, 270 Minn. 538, 551-52 , appellant argues that extrinsic evidence of the foreign conviction is prohibited if “by definition, that crime could have constituted an offense which is not a felony in this state.” Briton, 265 Minn
State v. Hanson 182 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1971
State v. Hanson 182 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1971
Appellant points to State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , 121 N. W. (2d) 577 , in which by way of dictum it was observed that a 20-year sentence for forging a check for $30.36 was unduly harsh.
Ryan v. State 172 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1969
Ryan v. State 172 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1969
The claim that the information was defective was based upon our decision in State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , 121 N. W. (2d) 577 .
Hayes v. State 169 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1969
Hayes v. State 169 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1969
Defendant relies on State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , 121 N. W. (2d) 577 ; State ex rel.
State v. Schultz 136 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1965
State v. Schultz 136 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1965
n part: “No indictment shall be insufficient, nor shall the trial, judgment, or other proceedings thereon be affected, by reason of a defect or imperfection in matter of form which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant upon the merits.” In State v. Clark, 270 Minn. 538 , 134 N. W. (2d) 857 , this court manifested its conclusion not to adhere to State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , 121 N. W. (2d) 577 , relied upon by defendant.
State v. Clark 134 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1965
State v. Clark 134 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1965
Subsequent to the appeal, our decision in State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , 121 N. W. (2d) 577 , was filed.
State v. Lehn 134 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1965
State v. Lehn 134 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1965
The defendant argues that the information in this case is not unlike the one before this court in State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , 121 N. W. (2d) 577 .
State v. Clark 131 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1964
State v. Clark 131 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1964
Masters v. Tahash, 266 Minn. 348 , 123 N. W. (2d) 600 ; and State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , 121 N. W. (2d) 577 .
State v. Owens 129 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1964
State v. Owens 129 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1964
The defendant contends that under authority of State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , 121 N. W. (2d) 577 , the information upon which he was arraigned is fatally defective and that he is accordingly entitled to a reversal.
State Ex Rel. Masters v. Tahash 123 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 1963
State Ex Rel. Masters v. Tahash 123 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 1963
The charge against relator was made by an information identical in form to one described in State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , 121 N. W. (2d) 577 , therein held demurrable or “fatally defective.” The substance and form of the information in question alleged that petitioner on August 5, 1960, “did wrongfully, unlawfully, and fe-loniously utter, offer and put off as true” a forged check in the amount of $97.89 which he cashed at a Standard Oi
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1963
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1963
“Larceny in other cases is petit larceny.” 8 In a case where the only prior conviction charged in the information resulted from a plea of guilty to a crime which might not have been a felony if committed in Minnesota, § 610.28 was held not to apply in State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326 , 121 N. W. (2d) 577 .