Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Biron, 123 N.W.2d 392.

63 citing documents.

In the Appeal of Jared Cunningham re: DHS Appeal for Maltreatment of a Minor. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Jonas David Nelson 886 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jonas David Nelson 886 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2016
See State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 283, (concluding that a confession was inadmissible when an officer implied that the defendant would be tried as a juvenile only if he confessed).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony James Cox 884 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Anthony James Cox 884 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2016
See State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 281
State v. Zabawa 787 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2010
State v. Zabawa 787 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2010
State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 281
State v. Farnsworth 738 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 2007
State v. Farnsworth 738 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 2007
266 Minn. 272, 277-78, 282 , 399 (1963).
State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 281
In Re the Welfare of D.B.X. 638 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of D.B.X. 638 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See, (police improperly suggested to juvenile defendant that they had influence with county attorney and could arrange for counseling or reduced charge if mitigating circumstances existed); Ga rner, d at 727 (interrogating officer, among other things, lied to accused); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282 , (police made promises that “could only have had the effect of implanting” hope that accused would be treated with leniency); D.S.N., d at 815 (police officer suggested county attorney would pro
In Re the Welfare of D.S.N. 611 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Welfare of D.S.N. 611 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
ary where police representations to 20-year-old implied defendant would receive treatment, rather than prosecution, if he confessed), review denied (Minn. June 25, 1987); , 468 (Minn. App.1984) (confession involuntary where police implied no charges would be brought, and defendant would instead receive counseling, if the defendant confessed); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282 , (confession involuntary where police statements and-representations to 18-year-old were persuasive and “could only hav
Zellman Ex Rel. M.Z. v. Independent School District No. 2758 594 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Zellman Ex Rel. M.Z. v. Independent School District No. 2758 594 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 281
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
568 (1897); -11 (Minn.1995); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282
State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
“ ‘[T]he trustworthiness of a confession should not in every instance be discounted because investigative officers in their interviews might have made discursive or imprecise statements to the defendant.’ ” d at 107 (quoting State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282 , ).
State v. Thaggard 527 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1995
State v. Thaggard 527 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1995
2d 344 (Minn.1984) (promise to release defendant pending formal charging and to summon him rather than arrest him on a warrant did not render defendant’s confession “involuntary”); State v. [Kevin] Anderson, (promise to a defendant that a female friend would be released from jail if he gave a written statement did not render his confession “involuntary”); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , (holding “involuntary” a confession obtained from an 18-year-old who was promised juvenile treatment if he con
State v. Ostrem 520 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Ostrem 520 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 281
State v. Barner 486 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Barner 486 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 280 , (quoting State v. Staley, 14 Minn. 75, 79-80 (1869)).
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1991
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1991
See id.; see also State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , (police officer’s misrepresentations of law intended to induce confession violated due process).
State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
The facts of the instant case are not like those in State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272
State v. Shamp 422 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Shamp 422 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“[T]he trustworthiness of a confession should not in every instance be discounted because investigative officers * * * in their interviews might have made discursive or imprecise statements to the defendant.” State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282 , -01 (Minn.1979), cert.
State v. Anderson 404 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Anderson 404 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282 , -68 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
State v. Anderson 396 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1986
State v. Anderson 396 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1986
(promise to release defendant pending formal charging and to summon him rather than arrest him on a warrant did not render defendant’s confession “involuntary”); (promise to a defendant that a female friend would be released from jail if he gave a written statement did not render his confession “involuntary”); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , (holding “involuntary” a confession obtained from a 18-year-old who was promised juvenile treatment if he confessed).
State v. Budke 372 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Budke 372 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cf. State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , (involuntary confession when induced by promises of special treatment).
State v. Gard 358 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Gard 358 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
1336, 1342-43 , 10 L.Ed.2d 513 (1963); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 280
State v. Jensen 349 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Jensen 349 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
1336, 1342 , 10 L.Ed.2d 513 (1963); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 280
Matter of Welfare of M.D.S. 345 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1984
Matter of Welfare of M.D.S. 345 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1984
The leading case in Minnesota with regard to this issue is State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272
State v. Orscanin 283 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1979
State v. Orscanin 283 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1979
See, State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272
State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
at 1343 , 10 L.Ed.2d at 521 ; State v. Raymond, 305 Minn. 160, 174 , State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282
State v. Reilly 269 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1978