Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 123 N.W.2d 371.

100 citing documents.

Afscme Dist. Coun. 96 v. Ind. Sch. Dist. 381 351 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284
In re Arbitration between AFSCME District Council 96 & Independent School District No. 381, Two Harbors 351 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284
Helmerichs v. Bank of Minneapolis & Trust Co. 349 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Helmerichs v. Bank of Minneapolis & Trust Co. 349 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See also Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284
National Indemnity Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 348 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1984
National Indemnity Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 348 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1984
of Minn., 266 Minn. 284, 287-288 , -75 (1963).
Mohs v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 349 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mohs v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 349 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
§ 645.22; Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284
Cloquet Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 94 344 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1984
Cloquet Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 94 344 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1984
Drawing upon the 1963 case of Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284, 291 , we delineated as follows the standard applicable in actions to compel arbitration: (1) If the parties evinced a clear intent to arbitrate a controversy arising out of specific provisions of the contract, the matter is for the arbitrators to determine and not the court.
McGrath v. State 312 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1981
Arbitration Between Ramsey County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 91, Local 8 309 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1981
Arbitration Between Ramsey County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 91, Local 8 309 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1981
See also Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284
Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 309 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1981
Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 309 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1981
This statement is consistent with the court’s statement in Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284, 291 , that Minn.Stat.
Brothers Jurewicz, Inc. v. Atari, Inc. 296 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1980
Brothers Jurewicz, Inc. v. Atari, Inc. 296 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1980
4 Atari next asserts that our decision in Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284 , supports the conclusion that jurisdiction over questions of laches is in the arbitrator.
Minnesota Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 495 290 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1980
Minnesota Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 495 290 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1980
Under our analysis, the act established the following rules for determination of the arbitrability of a grievance which, citing Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284 , we identified in Ateas v. Credit Clearing Corp., 292 Minn. 334 , : Hence, the following propositions may be stated: (1) If the parties evinced a clear intent to arbitrate a controversy arising out of specific provisions of the contract, the matter is for the arbitrators to
Albert Lea Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 241 284 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1979
Albert Lea Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 241 284 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1979
(3) If no agreement to arbitrate exists, either in fact or because the controversy sought to be arbitrated is not within the scope of the arbitration clause of the contract, the court may interfere and protect a party from being compelled to arbitrate (§ 572.09[a, b]).” See, also, Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of University, 266 Minn. 284
City of Brooklyn Center v. Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union Local No. 320 271 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1978
Ellerbrock v. Bd. of Ed., Sp. Sch. Dist. No. 6 269 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1978
Ellerbrock v. Bd. of Ed., Sp. Sch. Dist. No. 6 269 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1978
State v. Berthiaume, Minn., In re Discharge of Johnson, 288 Minn. 300 , Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284 , ; Minn.St.
State v. Berthiaume 259 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1977
State v. Berthiaume 259 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1977
See, also, Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284
Eric A. Carlstrom Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 77 256 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1977
Eric A. Carlstrom Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 77 256 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1977
Co., 803 Minn. 473 , Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. Currier 245 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1976
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. Currier 245 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1976
“* * * [T]he basic intent of the act is to discourage litigation and to foster voluntary resolution of disputes in a forum created, controlled, and administered by the written agreement.” Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284, 288
STATE, ETC. v. McGuire Architects-Planners 245 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1976
STATE, ETC. v. McGuire Architects-Planners 245 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1976
Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission v. City of Minnetonka 242 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 1976
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission v. City of Minnetonka 242 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 1976
Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284, 288 , Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334, 341 , Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 228 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1975
Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 228 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1975
Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284
INTERN. U. OF E. & M. WKRS. v. Portec, Inc. 228 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1975
International Union of Electrical & Machine Workers, Local No.1140 v. Portec, Inc. 228 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1975
INTERN. U. OF E. & M. WKRS. v. Portec, Inc. 228 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1975
Co., 296 Minn. 195 , Fischer v. Guaranteed Concrete Co., 276 Minn. 510 , Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284 , Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577
International Union of Electrical & Machine Workers, Local No.1140 v. Portec, Inc. 228 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1975
Co. 296 Minn. 195 , Fischer v. Guaranteed Concrete Co. 276 *345 Minn. 510 , Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284 , Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co. 249 Minn. 577
EDEN LAND CORPORATION v. Minn-Kota Excavating, Inc. 223 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1974
EDEN LAND CORPORATION v. Minn-Kota Excavating, Inc. 223 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1974
The roles of the arbitrators and the courts in determining whether the parties have agreed to arbitrate an issue have been fully articulated in Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284 , and Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334
Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 218 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1974
Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 218 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 1974
3 As we declared in Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of University, 266 Minn. 284, 288 , : *154 “* * * Even though resort to courts is authorized, the basic intent of the act is to discourage litigation and to foster voluntary resolution of disputes in a forum created, controlled, and administered by the written agreement.” Supporting this view of the special, non judici
Grover-Dimond Associates, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'n 211 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1973
Grover-Dimond Associates, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'n 211 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1973
c. 572 and by our decisions, to encourage arbitration as a “speedy, informal, and relatively inexpensive procedure for resolving controversies arising out of commercial transactions.” Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284, 287
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of America 197 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1972
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of America 197 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1972
See, Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284, 290 (footnote 13)
Johnson v. Village of Plymouth 180 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1970
Johnson v. Village of Plymouth 180 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1970
“In an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to compel arbitration under Minnesota Statutes, 572.09 of the Uniform Arbitration Act, our Supreme Court, in Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University, 266 Minn. 284, 287-8 , 123 N. W. (2d) 371, 374 , said: “ ‘One of the fundamental objectives of the act [Uniform Arbitration Act] was to encourage and facilitate the arbitration of disputes by providing a speedy, informal, and relatively inexpensive procedure for resolving controversies

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by