Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of Isle, 122 N.W.2d 36.

47 citing documents.

Richard R. Ryan, Trustee for the Next-of-Kin of Debra Lynn Ryan, Decedent for Action for Death by Wrongful … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that “loss of consortium cannot fairly be said to constitute an injury to the person, but rather appears to be a consequential item of damage resulting from such a type of injury, and giving rise to a separate and independent cause of action”).
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 365 , see also Kryzer, d at 36 (citing both “the proximate cause” and "a proximate cause” standards for the causation necessary between intoxication and injury); Hempstead v. Minneapolis Sheraton Corp., 283 Minn. 1, 9
Johnson v. Foundry, Inc. 702 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Johnson v. Foundry, Inc. 702 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 365 , (affirming award for loss of support to wife when wife’s means of support was “substantially damaged by reason of the injuries and disabilities suffered by her husband whose intoxication was the proximate cause thereof’); Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc., (Minn.App.1997
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 368
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 544 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1996
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 544 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1996
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360 , Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn. 307 , 50 N.W.
Soucek v. Banham 503 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Soucek v. Banham 503 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 367-68 , ).
Covey v. Detroit Lakes Printing Co. 490 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Covey v. Detroit Lakes Printing Co. 490 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 367-68
M.H. v. Caritas Family Services 488 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1992
M.H. v. Caritas Family Services 488 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1992
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 367-68
Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 367-68 , Meyer v. Tenvoorde Motor Co., 714 F.Supp.
Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co. 411 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co. 411 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 367-68
Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Id.; see State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 367-68
Kamrath v. Suburban National Bank 363 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kamrath v. Suburban National Bank 363 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 367, 368
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 368-69 , -42 (1963).
Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc. 330 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1983
Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc. 330 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1983
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 367 , (citations omitted).
Hannah v. Chmielewski, Inc. 323 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1982
Hannah v. Chmielewski, Inc. 323 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1982
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360
Langeland v. Farmers State Bank of Trimont 319 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1982
Langeland v. Farmers State Bank of Trimont 319 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1982
See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insur *32 ance Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360
Robinson v. Lamott 289 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1979
Robinson v. Lamott 289 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1979
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360 , Randall v. Village of Excelsior, 258 Minn. 81 , Stabs v. City of Tower, 229 Minn. 552
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 170 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1969
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 170 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1969
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360 , , which, in different contexts, reiterate the rule.
City of St. Paul v. Sorenson 167 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1969
City of St. Paul v. Sorenson 167 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1969
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360 , 122 N. W. (2d) 36 .
Schwalich v. Guenther 166 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1969
Schwalich v. Guenther 166 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1969
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360 , 122 N. W. (2d) 36 ; Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 247 Minn. 515 , 77 N. W. (2d) 651 ; Libaire v. Minneapolis & St.
Okrina v. Midwestern Corporation 165 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1969
Okrina v. Midwestern Corporation 165 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1969
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360 , 122 N. W. (2d) 36 , for the proposition that there can be no recovery for the physical consequences of fright in the absence of a contemporaneous physical injury.
Glaesemann v. Village of New Brighton 130 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1964
Glaesemann v. Village of New Brighton 130 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1964
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360 , 122 N. W. (2d) 36 ; Empire Fire & Marine Ins.
Herbes v. Village of Holdingford 125 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1963
Herbes v. Village of Holdingford 125 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1963
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 366 , 122 N. W. (2d) 36, 40 , we considered the meaning of the term as it applied to the wife of an injured husband and said: “* * * Generally speaking, in actions under civil damage enactments it has been held that ‘means of support’ has reference to the standard of living to which a wife is accustomed, taking into
Bundy v. City of Fridley 122 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1963
Bundy v. City of Fridley 122 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1963
Co. v. Village of Isle, 265 Minn. 360, 366 , 122 N. W. (2d) 36 , 40: “* * * Generally speaking, in actions under civil damage enactments it has been held that ‘means of support’ has reference to the standard of living to which a wife is accustomed, taking into consideration the physical capabilities and earning capacities of her husband, and that it shoul