Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Liebsch v. Abbott, 122 N.W.2d 578.

28 citing documents.

Steve Enestvedt, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
James Dennis Omwenga, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Jones v. Amoco Oil Co. 483 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Jones v. Amoco Oil Co. 483 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
“[Section] 559.21 contemplates contracts of actual purchase and not agreements wholly dependent upon some contingency.” Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447, 454 , (procedures of section 559.21 did not apply because contract performance was contingent upon buyer obtaining a $20,000 mortgage loan).
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Granite Falls 463 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Granite Falls 463 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447, 457 , (if the trial court’s decision is correct, the appellate court can sustain it for a different reason).
Johnny's, Inc. v. Njaka 450 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Johnny's, Inc. v. Njaka 450 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447, 451
Warthan v. Midwest Consolidated Insurance Agencies, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Warthan v. Midwest Consolidated Insurance Agencies, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447, 457
UnBank Co. v. Whittaker-Gomez 438 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
UnBank Co. v. Whittaker-Gomez 438 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447, 456
Berg v. Ackman 431 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Berg v. Ackman 431 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447, 456
Doerr v. Clayson 375 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1985
Doerr v. Clayson 375 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1985
In Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447, 456 , we affirmed the general principle enunciated in Blosick that, once rescinded by a vendee, the contract for deed could not be cancelled by the vendor.
Romain v. Pebble Creek Partners 310 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1981
Romain v. Pebble Creek Partners 310 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1981
Notice was not necessary in Chapman v. Salem Lutheran Church, 301 Minn. 486 , Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447 , and Joslyn v. Schwend, 85 Minn. 130 , 88 N.W.
Minnesota Ltd., Inc. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N OF HIBBING 208 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1973
Minnesota Ltd., Inc. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N OF HIBBING 208 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1973
Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin, supra; Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd. 278 Minn. 104 , *319 Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447 , Kundel v. Portz, 301 Mich.
Gustafson v. Gervais 189 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 1971
Gustafson v. Gervais 189 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 1971
In Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447, 451 , 122 N. W. (2d) 578, 581 , this court stated: “A material breach of contract justifies the other party in rescinding.
Borgerding Investment Company v. Larson 170 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 1969
Borgerding Investment Company v. Larson 170 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 1969
Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447 , 122 N. W. (2d) 578 .
Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd. 153 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1967
Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd. 153 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1967
(3 ed.) § 1808; Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447 , 122 N. W. (2d) 578 ; and 17 Am.
Lake Company v. Molan 131 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1964
Lake Company v. Molan 131 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1964
A condition precedent calls for the performance of some act or the happening of some event after the contract is entered into, and *499 upon the performance or happening of which its obligation is made to depend.” See, also, Liebsch v. Abbott, 265 Minn. 447 , 122 N. W. (2d) 578 ; 17A C. J. S., Contracts, § 338; Monteleone v. Blache, 11 La.